(June 29, 2018 at 6:54 pm)Kit Wrote:(June 29, 2018 at 6:52 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: Premise 2 is in conflict with premise 1, therefore the conclusion couldn't possibly tie it together.
Explain to me how a moral super being has no obligation to reveal morality in such a way to his creations that leaves no room for denial?
Not sure I see what Mr. Wizard is saying about premise 2 conflicting with 1.
However, if morality were not deterministically discoverable such that true from false morals could be determined, that fact alone would lead to more immorality rather than less simply through sheer accident of good people mistaking false morality for true. I doubt that's compatible with traditional attributes of God.