(June 29, 2018 at 7:51 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(June 29, 2018 at 7:33 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: I don't see how a God can be set up as the source of morality that must be good and then have moral obligations. If god was the source of morality and god said that not revealing objective morals is in fact moral, how could you argue with that? Not only have you already established that the god must be morally good but you wouldn't have your own morality to judge that god because it is already established that the god himself is the source of morality.
If God said that 2 + 2 = 5, you would believe him? I would say, "Surely, God, you must be joking!"
If your premise established that god was the source of math and his answers must be right, how would I know the difference?