(June 29, 2018 at 8:31 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: I do understand reductio absurdum but my point is that if god is the author of morals and he must be good then he can not make a moral decision that is bad. Meaning that making the decision to not inform us must be good as we established in premise. Therefore a god who is the source of morality, who is good, and who chooses not to inform us could in fact exist.
Talk about mental gymnastics.
Authorship does not equate to perfection.
Short and simple is key.