(August 29, 2018 at 7:52 am)Brian37 Wrote:(August 29, 2018 at 7:43 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I don't think that you know what an apologist is. Also, I still didn't say any of that. I just asked how you came to that conclusion, for instance, what is it you don't think that I understand? So far, it just seems to be senseless ramblings as one poster used to say, a mile wide, and an inch deep.
To the OP..... you could try Brian's method on for size. I don't think that he tries that hard.
Yes I do, someone who sells crap pretending it is worth something.
Apologists are NOT required in the age of modern science.
There is no holy writing required in a lab.
If you are going to argue for an old bronze age deity, sorry, I won't fall for it anymore than you buy claims of Ra, Isis or Horus.
When the Ancient Egyptians made up a sun god, they had more to point at than your invisible sky wizard.
It still doesn't appear that you know what apologists means. However I find that most do try to address questions posed with a coherent explanation. I prefer this, rather than you going off in all directions, with the same spiel no matter what the conversation and concerning things that I don't say or believe. Most of your reasons (which is what I asked) just seem to be fluff and fallacies.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
