(October 19, 2018 at 12:03 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 18, 2018 at 11:01 pm)Joods Wrote: Your dishonesty and failure to admit that you provided misleading information during a discussion.
Still trying to argue semantics?
Given your dishonesty regarding this thread, you hardly stand in the position to discuss semantics. Posting misleading (also called lying to serve your own purpose) information damages your credibility regarding this subject. Whenever someone posts links proving you wrong, you fail to actually read the necessary information in order to have a proper discussion.
Quote:My response was to you claiming the drug was available over the counter, for which you provided no source.
No. Your response to me was because I called you out for posting US law regarding schedule 2 - 5 drugs, with schedule 5 being the mildest of these classifications. Schedule 5 drugs still include some percentage of narcotics, of which the drug we are talking about does not. So you still provided misleading information in order to serve your own agenda. When I showed you that you were wrong, you shifted your goal posts to include drug information only relevant to South Africa and even then - you were wrong.
Quote:You claimed that misoprostol wasn't a controlled substance.
It wasn't a claim. it was a fact and I provided you with information on that, which I'm sure you didn't bother to read, because you knew you were wrong. I'm not going to keep repeating myself simply because you choose to be obtuse about it.
(October 18, 2018 at 12:34 pm)Joods Wrote: This would have been credible information except that you made the assumption that misoprostol is a controlled substance. In some areas, it could even be sold over the counter under other names.
If it is only available by prescription, that sounds like control to me...
Now did I post information irrelevant to the U.S.? sure, but tell me exactly what it changed in regards to needing a prescription?[/quote]
Plenty. Depending on what name the drug is under (there are 8 different names), depends on whether or not it can be found OTC (2 of the 8). Again - a point that you will refuse to acknowledge even when I point out a link for you, which I won't because.... You didn't bother reading the information to the links I did provide so far, so you'll apply the same amount of ignorance to any other links I give you.
You ride my ass for not citing a source, but since you were so gung-ho about intentionally providing misleading info and citing US law that doesn't apply to this particular drug, given it lacks any narcotics, then you could have easily found the information yourself.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
