Ok just one last thought: I think that supreme court sees this as seller's right to offer rather than right to sell. I mean if you go to a pizza shop you can only order what is on the menu and if they don't offer like Neapolitan pizza you can't make them do it. So my guess is that supreme court saw it from that point of view, that you can not insist on a product that doesn't exist.
Of course it is ridiculous because this guy is obviously a homophobe since the difference is minimal, but hey it is a way to look at it.
Of course it is ridiculous because this guy is obviously a homophobe since the difference is minimal, but hey it is a way to look at it.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"