Death Penalty

[Amarok]

Because revenge is a vice not a virtue and life cannot pay for life . However caring for the victims and help ease their burden is a virtue .

No, why should the state compensate the victims?

1. Well we were willing to kill someone for them seems a competitively small burden to help them put their lives back together 

2. We compensate other losses . Why not murder ?

3. It seems a compassionate thing to do as a society to help ease some of the financial burden or emotional burden 

4. Thou I say state I'm not against another method of compensation .

---

Against it. It's barbaric and hypocritical, and it does nothing to deter crime or increase the safety of citizens.

Are you being dense? You aren't answering my question. No more platitudes, please.

Those are not  platitudes it's a fact 

1. It's barbaric as it argues some form of blood sacrifice nonsense 

2.It's hypocritical due to the fact it justifies bloodshed as a means of dealing slights 

3.It's ineffective as a deterrent