(March 20, 2019 at 9:26 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 20, 2019 at 9:06 pm)Belaqua Wrote: It seems that I hold logical conclusions to be reasonable evidence for believing something, and you don't.
I think that many philosophers and theologians have and still are making sincere efforts to answer hard questions, and you think they are just avoiding questions.
I think we can leave it there.
You realize that the premises for these arguments need to be demonstrated sound before you can accept their conclusions as true, yes? Every single serious logical argument for the existence of god contains at least one disputed, contested premise.
Or fallacy. Perhaps a corollary to the 'lack of evidence' for God argument against accepting the existence of any deity as real we should add 'lack of arguments that stand up to scrutiny'.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.