RE: No reason justifies disbelief.
March 21, 2019 at 4:20 pm
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2019 at 4:29 pm by possibletarian.)
(March 20, 2019 at 9:06 pm)Belaqua Wrote:(March 20, 2019 at 8:01 pm)possibletarian Wrote: true in any meaningful wayIt seems that I hold logical conclusions to be reasonable evidence for believing something, and you don't.
I think that many philosophers and theologians have and still are making sincere efforts to answer hard questions, and you think they are just avoiding questions.
I think we can leave it there.
Now here's our problem, you believe that an argument led by logic could be reasonable evidence for believing something, you then go on to say that you think that many sincere philosophers and theologians have been making sincere efforts to answer hard questions, yet at the same time they have clearly have not yet (despite having hundreds of years to make that argument) convinced you to believe. I didn't say they were avoiding questions I said they are avoiding saying that they don't know the answer, which by the way is the answer you agree with.
Given that you are a none believer and you sincerely believe this process can result in evidence for a god, is there some new argument or new method we should look at?
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'