No reason justifies disbelief.

[LadyForCamus]

So then you admit these arguments are not arguments for the judeochristian tri-omni god?  

I'm not sure why you're asking this.

Well, if you’d bothered to read, quote, and respond to the rest of that paragraph, it would be obvious why I asked it. But, you chose to quote-mine me instead. Do you realize how blatantly dishonest that seems? I asked you in follow-up:

So...what good are they then?  What do they tell us about the origins of the universe? What meaningful thing do they tell us about any god?

Care to answer any of these questions honestly, or are you just going quote-mine me for the entire discussion?  Also, I’ve asked you twice (and so has Possibletarian):

Why aren’t you persuaded by the logical arguments for the existence of god?

and for the third time—

Why should we take these arguments seriously if their premises rely on the empirical observations you said we couldn’t use to investigate god?

and...I’ve lost count—

What is this reliable, alternative method to science, of investigating god-claims, and how you know it’s reliable?


I don’t know what you thought coming here, but you have work to do.