(March 21, 2019 at 11:54 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote:(March 21, 2019 at 11:42 pm)bennyboy Wrote: 100% of questions science has answered are those which can be answered with observations made about entities and events within the space-time framework. 0% of the questions science has answered are about why such a framework exists rather than not.
Out of your gourd, again...but lets just pretend that this were true, so what? Its an argument from ignorance. It doesn't establish that there are metaphysical this or that's or immaterial this or that's, or even that science couldn;t answer some question.....simply asserts that "like, science doesn't know some stuff, man"
-and....?
Who's trying to establish anything metaphysical? I'm saying that there are some questions science can't answer. My assertion is a logical one: science is based on observation of things IN the space-time framework. The space-time framework is not in the space-time framework, and cannot be observed in that way.
If you want to assert that science CAN answer the question of cosmogony, then you'll have to demonstrate that observations aren't intrinsically and irresolvably limited in a way that prevents us studying their parent framework. If you can't do that, then science BY DEFINITION is not the right tool for studying cosmogony.