No reason justifies disbelief.

[bennyboy]

Airing the contents of your disagreement and dissatisfaction with science is useless with me.

Why would an empirical object be immune to a method of empirical investigation?  What method did you use to answer the questions that an empirical method can't, and what's the answer, for reference?

Why are you still babbling about empiricism? As I said, that's your song, not mine.

Nor did I claim to have answers to some of the questions science can't answer. It's almost like I'm. . . I dunno. . . agnostic or something. I think a sincere "I don't" is much better than a fervent subscription to the dogma of the day, whether its symbol is a cross or a microscope.

I like science. I'm not a big fan of Science.