(August 13, 2019 at 1:38 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Meh, it hardly matters how much Acro prevaricates and avoids confronting the necessary criteria of realism, or how.
It can’t be any simpler. Realism requires a fact of a matter. If he knows that fact, he can show that fact. If he can’t, he doesn’t know it. He believes it. Beliefs are a description of subjective states.
Both of us recognizes that the holocaust is objectively wrong.
We lay out all the scientific and historical facts associated with it.
What we're not going find to laying among them, issome ethical truth, or an "objective badness" somewhere among the rubble.
If objective badness and goodness, does exist, which you I acknowledge it does, it's not contained in this,.
