(December 9, 2019 at 6:07 pm)EgoDeath Wrote:(December 9, 2019 at 11:35 am)Drich Wrote: Again Gen 1 shows man outside of the Garden and he was not said to be made of dust. He is said to be made in the image of God... From that it is possible he evolved.
Chapter 2 was a garden only narrative and a specific person Adam was created from mud and fast tracked into a fully developed homosapien. As such his given a soul.
And who is to say which creation story we're to give credence to? In the time that Genesis was written, it's said there was no need for consistency in story-telling; that the narrative was more than just a linear recounting of events. But does that hold up today? I'd say not. If we're to take the creation story as literal, then which one was it? Was it Chapter One or Chapter Two that defined the true creation? Or are we not to take the creation story as literal? And in that case, why pay it any attention at all, as scientific thinkers? Surely, if you're interested in understanding that period of time, the stories in Genesis can provide something for you. But if you're looking for an account of things that actually happened, is Genesis helpful at all?
That's the real question at the bottom of all of this.
WATCH THE VIDEO! Educate yourself before you jump in. We could very well be speaking on a creation/evolution topic you never heard of before!
Asked and answered this question my self in the video. I show that there are two separate narratives one is a 7 day creation where evolved man/the species of man is created day 6 out side the garden and the chapter 2 narrative is Garden only. meaning chapter 2 man is of a specific individual. Adam.
