RE: [Quranic Reflection]: The tolerance the Quran gave non-believers
December 26, 2019 at 7:40 am
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2019 at 7:40 am by R00tKiT.)
(December 26, 2019 at 1:17 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: But Mystic is Klorophyll are practicing organized cyber bullying in an obvious matter.Look kid, didn't Islam teach you not to lie? Because I am not the only one anymore who thinks you are Mystic (a duplicate profile) :
(December 21, 2019 at 4:25 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:https://atheistforums.org/thread-60123-page-7.html(December 21, 2019 at 4:24 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: I already said to the moderators it's Atlas duplicate and he's talking to himself, but apparently nobody wants to believe me.
I think you may be correct. Hope that helps you feel better.
If MysticKnight was coming back I think he would be full on MysticKnight.
(December 26, 2019 at 1:17 am)AtlasS33 Wrote:Quote: Wrote:Klorophyll Wrote:
Again, I deny the existence of a verse who mentions apostasy. I know it's enforced and I know it's there in the Islamic jurisprudence based on an authentic hadith.
And if it is established by a court of Islamic law that it is actual treason (which is extremely complicated to establish and requires incontrovertible proof already) then yes, the punishment is death.
This is daunting. But that is what cyber bullying is all about
Aww, that's touching. Grow up kid
(December 25, 2019 at 7:56 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: If you had such evidence you would have presented it in your very first post on this forum, but you didn’t, so it’s obvious you have no such evidence. You have a book of supernatural claims, and nothing else. Try again.
What kind of evidence are you looking for exactly? I said repeatedly expert judgment is the only possible way for people who don't speak Arabic to understand why the Qur'an is unique.
And you didn't ask here to prove the truth, you asked me to establish that it is miraculous. Miraculous isn't quivalent to true, especially to someone who doesn't think God exists.
I am afraid you are making a category mistake when asking about evidence for a book that assumes God exists.