Massacre of the Innocents
Perhaps it might help if people reviewed the entire thread before posting further. Succubus#2 had stated that the massacre of the innocents was based around Jerusalem (so couldn't have involved few children). It was actually set in Bethlehem, so his argument was invalid. That's the thing.
It's the academic consensus. I'm sure there's many learned articles out there which would discuss in further detail.
More importantly, the Infancy Gospel is more like the script for a horror movie than a kerygmatic or theological writing. It basically illustrates a fascination with the bizarre and a desire for religious entertainment that intentionally contains little history.
The canonical Gospels are written as bios (think biography). They have a series of ideas running through them- how the OT story continues, the arrival of the Kingdom of God, what Jesus did etc.
These do not appear on a blank canvas, but in a thoroughly Jewish context. There are connections, details and structures running through them, some not obvious to the modern eye, which tell us that the author is not trying to entertain, but to tell us about reality.
Perhaps it might help if people reviewed the entire thread before posting further. Succubus#2 had stated that the massacre of the innocents was based around Jerusalem (so couldn't have involved few children). It was actually set in Bethlehem, so his argument was invalid. That's the thing.
(April 1, 2020 at 10:20 pm)Jehanne Wrote: How do you know this, namely, when the Infancy Gospels were written?
It's the academic consensus. I'm sure there's many learned articles out there which would discuss in further detail.
Quote:And, what dates do you ascribe to the canonical Gospels?I tend to start with where the academic arguments lead to. So they're looking at things like relationship to AD 70, what are the hot topics being given centre stage, solutions to the synoptic problem etc. There's also the complication of Q. The latter half of C1 tends to be the ballpark, depending on which one we're talking about.
More importantly, the Infancy Gospel is more like the script for a horror movie than a kerygmatic or theological writing. It basically illustrates a fascination with the bizarre and a desire for religious entertainment that intentionally contains little history.
The canonical Gospels are written as bios (think biography). They have a series of ideas running through them- how the OT story continues, the arrival of the Kingdom of God, what Jesus did etc.
These do not appear on a blank canvas, but in a thoroughly Jewish context. There are connections, details and structures running through them, some not obvious to the modern eye, which tell us that the author is not trying to entertain, but to tell us about reality.
