RE: [Quranic Reflection]: Women have the right to state their own rights in the marriage
June 27, 2020 at 6:27 am
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2020 at 6:28 am by Fake Messiah.)
There are a lot of reasons why it is presumed that Koran allowed 'husbands' to beat their wives, like in Islamic pedophilia marriages like that stipulation that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” (65:4).
I mean are you telling me that some 30 year old Muslim married to 9 year old girl respects her and doesn't beat her? Even the sex between them is considered beating.
And even if woman is older there doesn't seem to be any respect towards her prescribed in Koran because Koran portrays women as essentially possessions of men. The Koran likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” (2:223).
And what about all the female sex-slaves Muslim husbands are allowed to have? I mean imagine the "respect" Muslims husbands have towards their sex slaves or is it a loophole because they are not technically married?
Because Koran tells us women sex-slaves have no rights, like the part that says Muslim is not to have sexual relations with a woman who is married to someone else—except a slave girl: “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you” (4:24).
And Koran allows men to marry up to four wives, and also to have sex with slave girls: “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3).
I mean are you telling me that some 30 year old Muslim married to 9 year old girl respects her and doesn't beat her? Even the sex between them is considered beating.
And even if woman is older there doesn't seem to be any respect towards her prescribed in Koran because Koran portrays women as essentially possessions of men. The Koran likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” (2:223).
And what about all the female sex-slaves Muslim husbands are allowed to have? I mean imagine the "respect" Muslims husbands have towards their sex slaves or is it a loophole because they are not technically married?
Because Koran tells us women sex-slaves have no rights, like the part that says Muslim is not to have sexual relations with a woman who is married to someone else—except a slave girl: “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you” (4:24).
And Koran allows men to marry up to four wives, and also to have sex with slave girls: “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3).
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
