RE: Are religions that preach inequality for women and gays, traitors to their country?
January 27, 2021 at 4:52 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2021 at 4:55 pm by Greatest I am.)
(January 26, 2021 at 4:20 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: There doesn't need to be any other than. If that were the only thing that you see happening in nature that you took moral issue with (which I highly doubt), that would be an example of something you find amiss in nature.
The extent to which you believe that it is "against natural law" is a thematic expression of how you perceive those acts. What you mean to say, I think, is that you think those people are wrong. Well..there you are, people doing it wrong in nature. Whatever else it may be, it's perfectly natural for human beings to do that.
Nature is fine. People are fucked.
I have no idea what your "There doesn't need to be any other than. " means.
Men and and women failing to protect their children from discrimination without a just cause, or adding to it the way Christians do, is hardly the best form of natural.
Regards
DL
(January 26, 2021 at 6:21 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: There's the outside possibility that GIA has erected a monument to antithesis in his moral schema - responding to a potential claim that homosexuality is against so called natural law as a matter of moral concern with the notion that homosexuality is..instead... a part of that same idea of natural law.
We can make any given thing good or bad by referring to a "natural law" - because there's no shortage of different outcomes for similar actions in nature. Never considering that the natural law part was the part where they began to go awry, not the homosex, his position becomes equivalent to their own and self referentially false for all of the same reasons.
Impressive. Your only goal.
Now try English.
Regards
DL