Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.

[Drich]

even hated and overly scrutinised i only average 1 warning per year and only 2 temp bans. This is not bad.

Actually, it's horrible. No one - and I mean NO ONE - has ever gotten disciplined that much and still remained a member. So, instead of bitching about how you get punished for rule breaking and adopting your childish 'I didn't do it' attitude, you should probably be asking why the Staff here have been so fucking lenient with you.

I know I do.

Boru

dude.. i'm the bad guy. everything i say is offensive. Or rather i should be, by the nature of the discussions we have from your pov. why wouldn't i be scrutinized especially if members complain about my very existence? why wouldn't atheists complain and want me gone?

We've had this discussion when it was everyone minus a few admins against me. (wanted me nuked a few years back remember?) it was hammered out then why the powers that be are as lenient. diversity and a true freedom of speech forum in so far as i do not break the rules. 

That said.. i am not complaining here. i am pointing out (as per the OP topic) Some Christians are indeed treated 'differently' rules are applied differently.

You say because i break the rules all the time. I say none of my infractions no matter how minor, gets a pass. so if you look at the number of 'infractions' it is 1 a year. if you look at what was done, it most likly should have never been counted. considering the pass you gave abaddon.

I am also saying, if you do not discipline those who are atheist when they do break the rules seriously, They will never accumulate the points i do. thus will never qualify for the same level of attention.

Again in this case i never mentioned the member but quoted the passage that exonerated me from a long time lie that one or two members created. if you will remember you gave me a polite warning and a day or two later i was suspended for a week, just so I could share the truth/prove myside of an argument.

this guy out right outed me, mis represented the quote to paint me into a slanderous narrative he created that did not reflect our discussion. so he could lie about my stability and temperament.  yet because he doesn't make waves I do, so seemingly he is commuted for a flagrant violation of the no posting pm rule and the selective editing a quote rule.

two hard rule violations ignored because he is on the atheist side. (even now his last post he is still pretending his selective editing was a proper quote) The dude is out right lying about a quote/context.

while I never violated the individuals privacy, and did a full cut and paste to reveal the whole truth... yet i was suspended.

Again not complaining. I have been in far more unfair situations on other websites and like my time here happy to be there, and allowed to continue on. same thing here. just point out the truth in the op's statement. i want not necessarily inform you as you are the puller of the trigger and know what you are doing, but for those c list members who insist everything is equal and fair on all sides.  as pointed out by some of the members answering the op.

---

that list of things i asked for are things that the email i am offering contain about me. seeings how your reading comprehension is not as on par as you would have us believe, That was me explaining to you why, i did not offer this email openly. because everything on the list that you in no way shape or form would want me to know, would be exposed to you, You being someone who does not like me, and does not have the same religious restrictions concerning integrity and respect for others as i do. 

quid pro quo Clarise.. quid pro quo.. 

if you are not willing to make that information known, then why would you ask the same of me? why would you continue to press and do your best to pressure me into giving you this info? Again sport,  if you will not trust me with that information why should i trust you?

Do you understand the reason for the list now?

I posted my own patent for all to see, so clearly that is not an issue.

You already claimed that your personal details would not be present since you had sold it anyway, so what are you afraid of?

You asked for stupid things like my bosses name. I have been self employed since the 90s. I have no boss nor want one. Another stupid demand.

Bottom line is that I have volunteered as much information as is bring asked of you. And you failed miserably. Because you don't have it to offer.

you are lying.. you selectively quoted me to change the intended meaning of the pm. this is why, i do not offer you any personal info tied to my patent process.