thoughtful, yes I would say that it's more reasonable to not believe than to believe. No problem. Kyu has said recently that humans are predisposed to believe. Perhaps he could expound on that.
We go on description of the nature of this being, and see how it pans out rationally. I didn't pick 'god' the undefined being, I picked a defined God. The subject of my faith is defined.
I follow reasoning that God's nature is as observed. That it can be observed and statements about it can be asserted and others not. So statements about God's nature can be specific.
All of this is superfluous to the non believer.
We go on description of the nature of this being, and see how it pans out rationally. I didn't pick 'god' the undefined being, I picked a defined God. The subject of my faith is defined.
I follow reasoning that God's nature is as observed. That it can be observed and statements about it can be asserted and others not. So statements about God's nature can be specific.
All of this is superfluous to the non believer.
