RE: A question regarding proof
September 7, 2011 at 9:21 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2011 at 9:25 pm by Fred.)
(September 7, 2011 at 8:57 pm)aleialoura Wrote: I've noticed you're really awful at making a clear point. The problem with your arguments: They don't go anywhere. None that I've seen anyway. Just a lot of vagueness that maybe might make some sense eventually.
Your inability to follow a logic chain is my responsibility, and my argument goes to a very specific place. There's nothing vague about it and it makes full sense right now. None of the dodging and weaving or name calling changes that. Keep up or shut up.
(September 7, 2011 at 9:12 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You should probably just provide evidence for whatever it is you're driving at. You'd seem like less of a loon (or maybe not, depending on what you put forward).
Sorry, Rhythm. Your one trick pony of "where's the evidence" isn't the pony we're talking about. You can call me a loon, but you would look less like a dogmatic blowhard if you could demonstrate it instead of just spouting it.
