RE: A question regarding proof
September 8, 2011 at 5:09 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2011 at 5:10 pm by fr0d0.)
(September 8, 2011 at 2:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: That I can imagine, propose, or reason in no way means that I have to accept what you consider to be reason, even less so over evidence.Would that be why it's called subjective evidence then?
(September 8, 2011 at 2:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Reason can help you guess, can help you to form a theory. If you want it to be a fact, you need observations, and they need to be objective.Objective evidence is objective evidence. I don't want or need subjective evidence to be fact. I'm quite happy that it is what it is.
(September 8, 2011 at 2:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: a rational conclusion supported by evidence that makes predictions which are born out by observation and repeated testing and then applied to achieve practical results....is worlds better.'Better' is a subjective opinion. Failing to attribute merit where it is deserved is surely foolish... so you'd be making some poor judgment calls as a result no doubt?
(September 8, 2011 at 2:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I still haven't seen anything even approaching rationality from theology.Your refusal to consider it might possibly explain that don't you think?