(September 8, 2011 at 5:49 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(September 8, 2011 at 5:19 pm)Fred Wrote: Excellent. Since nobody has produced anything to challenge it and we all agree, let's posit it as a given for our argument: There is no objective evidence for a dream pony.
There is no evidence for YOUR dream pony, because you have proposed a situation in which there can be none.
Mine, yours, everyone's, you are correct because there can be none.
So the first point stands. There is no objective evidence for a dream pony.
Ok, so now that that's settled, onward.
Quote:There is no reason, if this dream pony existed, that there could be no evidence, and again we do have evidence for the existence of dreams.
We have no objective evidence, as has been established. But we do have evidence, certainly. But in no way, shape, or form is that evidence solely objective and cannot be.
Quote:These are important distinctions which you fail to acknowledge because they leave you with no point to make.
Rhythm, your predictions and assumptions as to what I believe or where I am going have proven to wildly inaccurate so far. I'm not failing to acknowledge the distinctions. I just haven't gotten there because I've been delayed by all the assumptions and the ad hominen stuff, much of it from you.
Since I'm more interested in actually discussing the thesis of your evidence claim being broken, I'm going to beg off on the game ball stuff and focus on that. Ya wanna discuss without the stupid assumptions, fine. Ya don't, go join Aleia over on the sidelines and the two of you can call me names.
