RE: A question regarding proof
September 9, 2011 at 8:10 pm
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2011 at 8:20 pm by fr0d0.)
Fred referenced this case many posts ago. I'm surprised if you don't recall that Rhythm.
2nd paragraph: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/210/44...xtract.jpg
It appears that with very little brain, humans can divert functions to what little resources there are.
A case of no brain at all?:
2nd paragraph: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/210/44...xtract.jpg
It appears that with very little brain, humans can divert functions to what little resources there are.
A case of no brain at all?:
Quote:One related case that has received more exposure than most is that of Andrew Vandal, who was born on 12th July 1984. In the early stages of his development in the womb a cyst appeared on the stem of his brain. Known as an atelencephic aprosencephaly, this destructive event left the boy with a cranium containing nothing but fluid. In some cases, it can even leave victims with no detectible brain at all - a condition known as anencephaly or 'brainlessness'.source
Cases like Andrew's are again usually terminated before birth, but in this instance the subject was born and then put up for adoption. He was adopted by a paediatric nurse, Kaye Vandal, from Wallingford, Connecticut, US, who, when last asked about Andrew's welfare, stated that she remained devoted to 'giving him the best quality life for however long he lives.'
At the same time, Kaye stated that, against doctors' predictions, Andrew was able to laugh, giggle and smile and, has a 'glowing, outgoing, bubbly personality'. Kaye also stated that her young charge was able to respond to stimulus and was maturing mentally; both of which doctors believed to be impossible, considering his complete absence of brain matter.
Andrew was, however, unable to speak, and was cortically blind; that is, he could see images, but was unable unable to interpret them. Andrew was also incapable of walking, but did manage to drag himself along on his back.