A question regarding proof

[popeyespappy]

Virtually no brain at all, and no brain, are fantastically different things aren't they? So, what little brain these people had worked for them, fantastic, a brilliant story of succeeding in the face of adversity.

Much of this was recently discussed in the mind/brain thread.

And sometimes the show much go on anyway, even if the brain is mostly not there: http://bit.ly/dVIUn

I’d be interested in knowing more about the histological structure of Dr. Lorber’s student's brain and others that exhibit the same physical abnormalities yet retain normal functionality. Hydrocephalus affects the white matter of the brain a lot more than it does the gray matter. If the basic structure of the nerve cells that make up our neural net remain relatively intact despite what for all outward appearances to be a severe deformation it could explain the normal functionality.

http://www.psych.ufl.edu/~steh/PSB6087/b...essary.pdf

I’d also like to know a lot more detail about what Lorber considers normal functionality. The student’s ability to obtain a mathematics degree doesn’t really speak to other possible cognitive problems.