I personally can't point to any atheist philosophers for your concerns. In fact, I happen to actually have strong spiritual leanings myself. However, I don't view those as giving life any more 'meaning'. Although, they may be more romantically compelling, so I suppose in that sense that could be more 'meaningful' than a non-spiritual existence.
(February 22, 2012 at 12:04 am)AndrewT Wrote: I have one friend in particular that i am trying to find a "healthy" atheist communities or philosopher for to help him find his own meaning with out needing to use or convert to Christianity.
I find the fact that you point to Christianity as something that would supposedly give "meaning" to life to be quite strange.
Why should the idea of a jealous god who casts the vast majority of souls he creates into a place of eternal damnation, and saves only a very few souls to be his eternally unworthy servants who will forever be far beneath him, be any more
meaningful than a mere secular existence?
Would it supposedly be more
meaningful simply because it supposedly lasts forever?
What I would suggest to do is to simply ask your friend the following question?
If a short lifespan has no
meaning for you, then why would an eternal lifespan have any more
meaning?
Or perhaps this is a question you should ask yourself?
Why should an eternal life automatically have
meaning if a life that ends has no
meaning?
In what way would perpetuating life for eternity give it 'meaning' if it has no meaning in as a finite term?
A meaningless finite life, would still be meaningless if extended forever.
There would need to be something else that gives life meaning. And whatever that something else would be, should give meaning to either an eternal or a finite lifespan.
So life is either meaningful or it isn't. Whether a person is spiritual or not wouldn't have any bearing on that.
In fact, people who would desperately like to believe in an eternal life probably do so for two possible reasons.
1. They already see life as being hugely
meaningful and would like to extend this
meaningful situation forever.
OR
2. Perhaps they see life as being really disgusting and filled with suffering and without any meaning, and hope that if there could be "life after death" maybe things could
improve in that new situation thus bringing meaning to an otherwise meaningless life.
I imagine that most Christians are hoping for #2 to be true. They are hoping that the next life will be more meaningful than this one. Although, many of them may actually believe in both #1 and #2. Being both happy with this life, and hoping for an ever better life in the after life.
Of course, if they wind up in the Christian God's hell, suddenly their life after death would be far less meaningful than it could have ever been here.
So the religion actually offers a less meaningful life for most people. Jesus supposedly taught that the path is straight and the gate is narrow that leads to the Kingdom of God, and few will make it. That means that the vast majority of souls will unfortunately go to the other place.
~~~~~
On a totally different note, you might want to suggest to your "atheist" friend that he or she consider alternative spiritual pictures. It really doesn't need to be broken down to being either Hebrew Mythology or Atheism. There are far more choices out there. And some of them are really attractive. Far more so than the Hebrew mythology.
I can personally imagine a spiritual essence to reality that goes far beyond what most people seem to even be able to imagine. Far greater than anything the ancient Hebrews were capable of imagining for sure.
So the choices for spirituality don't need to be limited to just either atheism or Hebrew mythology.
Just realizing that might cheer your friend up.
~~~~
For me personally, a picture of eternal life does not make life more
meaningful. Life is either meaningful or it isn't.
In fact, for me to even desire that life should be eternal already implies that I feel that life is
meaningful, otherwise, why would I wish for it to be extended?
So the
meaningfulness of life is a given.
The question of whether or not it could potentially be extended eternally is a totally different question altogether.
My main reason for wishing that life could be eternally experience isn't even so much a personal desire. It actually has more to do with the idea that if life is just a very brief fleeting accident. It just seems like just a huge universe is just a waste. So in that sense (from the perspective of the universe itself), it seems that a continued state of consciousness and the ability to enjoy the physical things in life would be a good thing for the universe itself.
But that really has nothing to do with
meaning.
Clearly life is what it is, and that is the essence of
meaning right there.
If people didn't already feel that life is
meaningful then why would they be so obsessed with hoping that it could be eternal?
So the
meaning of life is an automatic given for everyone, be they spiritual or atheist. So ironically, it's actually a meaningless question to even ask.
The existence of a "God" would not give life "meaning".