Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 10:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
http://bbq.about.com/cs/porkpulled/a/aa080400a.htm
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
"Once the Texan has been shown the door over his pronouncements of the virtues of brisket,"

^This....Big Grin
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
BBQ in the south is practically a religion. Granted, a far more useful religion than any of the agnry desert god shit they usually drone on about.
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
(May 7, 2012 at 2:39 am)Jinkies Wrote: It always blows my mind when I see terrible arguments from atheists. I get that not every atheist arrived at atheism by being rational, skeptical, or intelligent in the slightest, but this thread is just ridiculous. Folks, your arguments absolutely blow. Try to exercise your critical thinking skills before spewing idiotic pro-meat bollox. It's okay if you like to kill and eat dudes, but there's no excuse for sounding like a dummo.

It seems that every vegetarian who comes to this site says that. Most people eat meat, and this is not a vegetarian site, so... do the math. Ya know, use that "logic" you keep talking about.
(May 7, 2012 at 1:15 pm)Jinkies Wrote: I'll give you the fact that we need food to survive. That's a good one. Does it need to be flesh, though? Not so much.

My instinct disagrees, it does need to be meat.
(May 7, 2012 at 1:49 pm)Jinkies Wrote: You're completely misrepresenting my intentions and my actions after I've explained that you are incorrect. Stay classy.

You say that your intention is to just get us to not use bad arguments, but then you keep going on about the morality of eating meat. You can't exactly give logical reasons why something is immoral. Are you arguing from a logical standpoint, or an ethical standpoint; the two don't really mix. There is nothing "logical" about not causing harm to animals.
"Sisters, you know only the north; I have traveled in the south lands. There are churches there, believe me, that cut their children too, as the people of Bolvangar did--not in the same way, but just as horribly. They cut their sexual organs, yes, both boys and girls; they cut them with knives so that they shan't feel. That is what the Church does, and every church is the same: control, destroy, obliterate every good feeling. So if a war comes, and the Church is on one side of it, we must be on the other, no matter what strange allies we find ourselves bound to."

-Ruta Skadi, The Subtle Knife
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
Me, living out here in ranch/feedlot/farming country, I still think I'm doing good to get t-bones for $5.99 (US) per POUND. You're paying that much for a KG! Wow!



There is one major nutrient that does not come from plants. That is vitamin B-12. Lack of vitamin B-12 leads to depression and fatigue, and long-term deficiency leads to brain malfunction or misdevelopment in foetuses and children.

This shows me that humans evolved to eat meat. Human's have both incisors and canines in their teeth - indicating that we are omnivores.

Certainly, one can get adequate vitamin B-12 from supplements - or have food which is fortified with vitamin B-12. It can be artificially synthesized, but that is a recent development (decades) in the time homo sapiens have existed.

Lacto-ovo vegetarians can get adequte vitamin B-12 from their diets without a problem.
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
Quote:It seems that every vegetarian who comes to this site says that.

It's the holier-than-thou attitude that pisses me off the most. They are as bad as the fucking theists when it comes to that shit.
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
(May 7, 2012 at 2:39 am)Jinkies Wrote: It always blows my mind when I see terrible arguments from atheists. I get that not every atheist arrived at atheism by being rational, skeptical, or intelligent in the slightest, but this thread is just ridiculous. Folks, your arguments absolutely blow. Try to exercise your critical thinking skills before spewing idiotic pro-meat bollox. It's okay if you like to kill and eat dudes, but there's no excuse for sounding like a dummo.

(May 14, 2012 at 8:57 pm)AthiestAtheist Wrote: It seems that every vegetarian who comes to this site says that. Most people eat meat, and this is not a vegetarian site, so... do the math. Ya know, use that "logic" you keep talking about.

Is your argument that most people here eat meat, and this is not a vegetarian site, therefore the arguments here are obviously going to be absolute shit? I don't agree if that's your point. I pointed out a number of flaws in some of the arguments here, but not all arguments on a site such as this are necessarily going to be that terrible. I'm not sure why you think so poorly of people such as yourself, but honestly not everyone has such poor arguments as you.
(May 7, 2012 at 1:15 pm)Jinkies Wrote: I'll give you the fact that we need food to survive. That's a good one. Does it need to be flesh, though? Not so much.

(May 14, 2012 at 8:57 pm)AthiestAtheist Wrote: My instinct disagrees, it does need to be meat.

Wait, so your "instinct" affects the types of food your body can consume? That's amazing! While James Randi hasn't touched on this topic exactly, you should totally contact him as soon as possible. There's no fucking way he won't give you that million bucks for having some sort of magical body.

Also, desire and instinct are not the same thing. You should educate yourself about what instincts actually are before claiming that they are what drive your behavior in this area.
(May 7, 2012 at 1:49 pm)Jinkies Wrote: You're completely misrepresenting my intentions and my actions after I've explained that you are incorrect. Stay classy.

(May 14, 2012 at 8:57 pm)AthiestAtheist Wrote: You say that your intention is to just get us to not use bad arguments, but then you keep going on about the morality of eating meat. You can't exactly give logical reasons why something is immoral. Are you arguing from a logical standpoint, or an ethical standpoint; the two don't really mix. There is nothing "logical" about not causing harm to animals.

I kept going on about morality because people kept giving shit arguments that I responded to. How are you missing that?

Minimalist Wrote:It's the holier-than-thou attitude that pisses me off the most. They are as bad as the fucking theists when it comes to that shit.

Yeah, because you obviously never see that holier-than-thou attitude from any meat eaters. I think you may have a slight bias there, dawg.
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
Quote:Yeah, because you obviously never see that holier-than-thou attitude from any meat eaters

Tu quoque dickhead.(look it up)Angry
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
(May 15, 2012 at 5:10 am)padraic Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, because you obviously never see that holier-than-thou attitude from any meat eaters

Tu quoque dickhead.(look it up)Angry

I'm familiar with tu quoque, but why would you think it applies here? I didn't state that I don't have a holier-than-thou attitude. I'm fairly certain I do. I'm just saying that I'm definitely not the only one here who has one. Do you disagree?

And calling me a dickhead? Fuck, you are one classy broad. I'm sure your intellectual arguments can only get better from here. Stay solid, broseph.
Reply
RE: Do you agree with Richard Dawkins?
(May 9, 2012 at 11:45 am)Minimalist Wrote: BBQ in the south is practically a religion. Granted, a far more useful religion than any of the agnry desert god shit they usually drone on about.


Here too. Every Aussie bloke should have have an outdoor,stainless steel, gas barbecue which can be seen from space.

The meal wast traditionally beef or pork sausages, made from fat off cuts,cereal and preservatives,plus huge shoulder 'lamb' chops. The barbecue was a 4 gallon drum with holes belted in with a pick and topped with a circular plough blade. Fuel;anything flammable lying around.
Served with; white bread,potato salad,iceberg lettuce,tomatoes, and canned beetroot.

Washed down with local long neck beer..


Today:cooked on a massive appliance which imparts great confidence in the male cook, but not skill


Whole snapper,chicken and green Thai curry kangaroo sates,specialty sausages at $7.50 a pound (vs $1.50 a pound),no shrimp (prawns)

Served with sourdough bread and focaccio, and seventeen kinds of salads from the latest gourmet magazine.

Washed down with bottled water, four or five kinds of boutique beer, a nice Chablis or Reisling and a decent Cabernet- Sauvignon.

Children are served indoors while they play video games..Angel Cloud
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Do you agree with Albert Einstein? Scabby Joe 11 4680 April 26, 2012 at 2:05 am
Last Post: AthiestAtheist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)