Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 1:23 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Transitional fossils
#1
Transitional fossils
Charles Darwin was a noble and humble man. He recognized that his greatest contribution to science could still be just a mere fantasy. In his book On the Origin of Species he acknowledged that the lack of evidence for transitional fossils was "the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory". This is the true sign of a scientist; one that formulates an idea and then seeks to be proven wrong.

Here's just 3 examples of the many species that existed that show a clear trend in the evolution of species. These examples illustrate how species had characteristics 'borrowed' from what we nowadays recognize as two clearly different species.


Attercopus fimbriunguis

[Image: tumblr_ly6ahnZoxc1qgxyxw.jpg]

Previously interpreted as the world's oldest spider, Attercopus fimbriunguis belongs to an extinct order of arachnids named Uraraneida, thought to be close to the origins of spiders. Attercopus can be envisaged as a spider-like animal able to produce silk, but which lacked true spinnerets and retained a segmented abdomen bearing a flagellum-like tail resembling that of a whip scorpion.[1]

Pederpes

[Image: Pederpes-m.jpg]
[Image: 100815.JPG]

The shape of the skull and the fact that the feet face forward rather than outward indicate that Pederpes was well adapted to land life. It is currently the earliest known fully terrestrial animal, although the structure of the ear shows that its hearing was still much more functional underwater than on land, and may have spent much of its time in the water and could have hunted there.[2]

Gerobatrachus

[Image: 250px-Gerobatrachus_NT.jpg]
[Image: Gerobatrachus.jpg]

Gerobatrachus, also referred to as a frogamander, is an extinct genus of amphibamid temnospondyl that lived in the Permian period, approximately 290 million years ago, in the area that is now Baylor County, Texas. The animal has been interpreted as a concrete example for the hypothesis offered by many cladistic analyses that frogs and salamanders had a common ancestor, and that they are only distantly related to the third extant order of amphibians, the caecilians. Gerobatrachus has been considered to be the closest relative of Batrachia, the clade that includes modern amphibians.

Gerobatrachus combines features found later in frogs, such as a large space for a tympanic ear— an "ear drum"— and two ankle bones that are fused together, a typical salamander trait. Its backbone and teeth show features common to both frogs and salamanders, with a wide, lightly built skull similar to that of a frog.[3]

So far, our geological records have provided evidence for the theory of evolution, hence why the theory hasn't altered to provide a better understanding.


[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attercopus
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederpes
[3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerobatrachus
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#2
RE: Transitional fossils
Yeah? I bet you will never find any transition fossil between homo sapiens and Christian fundamentalists.
Reply
#3
RE: Transitional fossils
(May 5, 2012 at 12:14 am)Chuck Wrote: Yeah? I bet you will never find any transition fossil between homo sapiens and Christian fundamentalists.


You have that backwards .Cool Shades
Reply
#4
RE: Transitional fossils
(May 5, 2012 at 1:56 am)padraic Wrote:
(May 5, 2012 at 12:14 am)Chuck Wrote: Yeah? I bet you will never find any transition fossil between homo sapiens and Christian fundamentalists.


You have that backwards .Cool Shades

Evolution doesn't imply progress, Pad.

Wink Shades

Reply
#5
RE: Transitional fossils
The sad thing is that the creationists, despite knowing the obvious, cannot let go of their outdated beliefs. Approving evolution will mean denying creationism - the very foundation on which most religious beliefs are built on. These creationists cannot see their foundation crumbling away.
Reply
#6
RE: Transitional fossils
(May 5, 2012 at 2:57 am)Forsaken Wrote: The sad thing is that the creationists, despite knowing the obvious, cannot let go of their outdated beliefs. Approving evolution will mean denying creationism - the very foundation on which most religious beliefs are built on. These creationists cannot see their foundation crumbling away.

I think the fundamental problem with the creationist world view is that they effectively work backwards in order to 'prove' or confirm to themselves that they're right.

1) God exists.
2) anything not in line with the Bible isn't correct.
3) evolution is not correct.
4) TRY and find problems with evolution to be able to discard it.

I've seen this reasoning in many areas, like when they try and defend the lack of credibility of the Gospels by saying 1) God exists therefore 2) the Bible must be infallible because 1) God exists.

I want to understand better where their world view actually makes contact with reality, if ever?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Reply
#7
RE: Transitional fossils
There are no transitional fossils. Fossils do not count toward evolution. If we did have transitional fossils then why haven't we seen an exposition of these so called transitional fossils where the point of transition has been proudly displayed? I want to see rock compared to rock....not the well drawn, false but amusing cartoon looking diagram that you see on wikipedia.

Reply
#8
RE: Transitional fossils
(May 5, 2012 at 6:02 am)Christian Wrote: There are no transitional fossils.

Other than the ones posted here.. and the vast libraries and museums of them you mean.... but OTHER than those..
Every fossil is a transitional fossil. You are a transitional fossil just waiting for a peat bog to fall into.

(May 5, 2012 at 6:02 am)Christian Wrote: Fossils do not count toward evolution. If we did have transitional fossils then why haven't we seen an exposition of these so called transitional fossils where the point of transition has been proudly displayed?

You mean, other than every major natural history museum in the world? Next time you go on holiday to the US or the UK, or .. well, any country that isn't Fiji I guess... take some time to visit a natural history museum.

If you can't do that. Google.

Quote:I want to see rock compared to rock....not the well drawn, false but amusing cartoon looking diagram that you see on wikipedia.

Google.

Here I'll give you one for free
http://chem.tufts.edu/science/evolution/...lution.htm
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog

If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic.
― Tim Minchin, Storm
Reply
#9
RE: Transitional fossils
(May 5, 2012 at 7:53 am)NoMoreFaith Wrote:
(May 5, 2012 at 6:02 am)Christian Wrote: There are no transitional fossils.

Every fossil is a transitional fossil.

They can never seem to understand this.
Cunt
Reply
#10
RE: Transitional fossils
(May 5, 2012 at 6:02 am)Christian Wrote: There are no transitional fossils. Fossils do not count toward evolution. If we did have transitional fossils then why haven't we seen an exposition of these so called transitional fossils where the point of transition has been proudly displayed? I want to see rock compared to rock....not the well drawn, false but amusing cartoon looking diagram that you see on wikipedia.
Can I ask you what exactly you think a transitional fossil is? Be as descriptive as you can.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Transitional Forms/Fossils QuackeryDetection 15 1848 November 12, 2022 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Creationist finds fossils, still not convinced zebo-the-fat 16 4203 May 31, 2015 at 11:21 am
Last Post: Worom
  AF's very own list of Transitional Fossils Duke Guilmon 21 10708 December 3, 2014 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: LostLocke
  Cockeyed Understanding Of Transitional Form Cosmic Perspective 16 7141 May 21, 2013 at 1:22 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Fossils foot bones hint at mystery walker frankiej 21 9548 March 31, 2012 at 5:32 pm
Last Post: Nine
  Lost Darwin Fossils Rediscovered frankiej 5 3288 January 17, 2012 at 10:55 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Two Million Year Old Whale Fossils Discovered in Driest Desert Erinome 11 4655 November 22, 2011 at 1:35 am
Last Post: Justtristo
  Malapa Fossils Minimalist 2 1785 July 25, 2011 at 12:31 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Yukon fossils represent a pivotal moment in evolution Ryft 37 13251 June 18, 2011 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Shell B



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)