everyone (else) seems to be hating on atheists

[Shell B]

That scripture does not back up your statement that you don't care what Americans think, Polaris. If you want to post random ass scripture, stick it in your sig.

[Polaris]

That scripture does not back up your statement that you don't care what Americans think, Polaris. If you want to post random ass scripture, stick it in your sig.

Do you always comment without reading the conversation you are referencing? It was about Jesus being the originator of the No True Scotsman fallacy for Christianity. The verses were the proof behind my claim.

[Annik]

That scripture does not back up your statement that you don't care what Americans think, Polaris. If you want to post random ass scripture, stick it in your sig.

Do you always comment without reading the conversation you are referencing? It was about Jesus being the originator of the No True Scotsman fallacy for Christianity.

She was giving you a warning as an admin. I do not recommend making an enemy of the staff.

[Polaris]

Do you always comment without reading the conversation you are referencing? It was about Jesus being the originator of the No True Scotsman fallacy for Christianity.

She was giving you a warning as an admin. I do not recommend making an enemy of the staff.

Warnings based off misunderstanding don't mean anything ultimately.

[Shell B]

Do you always comment without reading the conversation you are referencing?

Only when the conversation is exceedingly dull.

It was about Jesus being the originator of the No True Scotsman fallacy for Christianity. The verses were the proof behind my claim.

Exhibit A:

http://atheistforums.org/thread-13016-po...#pid292723

Notice that your post says nothing about the fallacy? Furthermore, the scripture you dragged out didn't say anything about these people not being true Christians. It had to do with their entry into heaven. As not all Christians go to Heaven, I'm sure you can deduce my meaning here.

[Polaris]

Do you always comment without reading the conversation you are referencing?

Only when the conversation is exceedingly dull.

It was about Jesus being the originator of the No True Scotsman fallacy for Christianity. The verses were the proof behind my claim.

Exhibit A:

http://atheistforums.org/thread-13016-po...#pid292723

Notice that your post says nothing about the fallacy? Furthermore, the scripture you dragged out didn't say anything about these people not being true Christians. It had to do with their entry into heaven. As not all Christians go to Heaven, I'm sure you can deduce my meaning here.

If you can't keep on top of a conversation, it is wise not to comment.

On the verses, if Jesus does not know them, they are not Christians. They can only become Christians because God knows them.

[Epimethean]

Why don't you join the Gideons, then?

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Why don't you join the Gideons, then?

How do you know he hasn't?

[Shell B]

If you can't keep on top of a conversation, it is wise not to comment.

If you can't even find relevant scripture, you should fucking can it.

On the verses, if Jesus does not know them, they are not Christians. They can only become Christians because God knows them.

No, you are a Christian if you believe Jesus Christ was the son of god and your savior. That's it. *rolls eyes*

[Polaris]

Actually that's not just it (when I was an agnostic, I did believe that though), but I'm not about to argue with some atheist about what being a Christian actually requires...though the Apostles' Creed sums it up well.