Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 2:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dualism
RE: Dualism
(July 7, 2009 at 1:17 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote:
(July 7, 2009 at 3:44 am)fr0d0 Wrote:
(July 6, 2009 at 6:03 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: They're as flexible as hell. No scale can be found to nail the suckers. Gods are made of rubber and convictions made of steel.
I think you're talking more about your own understanding Rabbit.
Still mindreading, Fro?

(July 7, 2009 at 3:44 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Although perhaps if you applied those attributes to a non believer you'd be venerating rather than mocking. So perhaps I should be flattered?
You should be flattered, you've managed to delude yourself with circular reasoning. You can plug in any god concept you like now, any time any place. This is not rubber, it is überrubber. Well done!

Sorry everyone for feeding the troll Confused
Reply
RE: Dualism
(July 7, 2009 at 2:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Sorry everyone for feeding the troll Confused
I like the self-reflective mood you're in today. Keep on truckin'
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Reply
RE: Dualism
(July 7, 2009 at 1:59 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:
(July 7, 2009 at 2:10 am)Darwinian Wrote:
(July 7, 2009 at 1:55 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: No you don't.

He does. Like all theists, he believes because he has a deep seated need to believe.

Fair enough but it sure as hell (don't exist) ain't based on logic.

Kyu
(July 7, 2009 at 12:16 pm)josef rosenkranz Wrote: There are two more possibilities to this optical phenomenon:
1) A fucking Israeli from the children of Israel who were impatiently awaiting down the Sinai mountain for the end of the interview between God and Moses put a polarized glass window between them so as God could have a good look to his beloved Prophet whereas dear Moses could only devine where his Godliness seats on his throne.
2) The first possibility could be denied as too primitive for that time so that they actually spoke at a video-conference and a technical angel blurried purposely the face of God .

Other solutions are open to be suggested.

Josef ... I'm sure you're a nice guy 'n all that but I have to say this ... you over-intellectualise and everything I have ever seen you write bores me shitless ... the best I ever do is skim over it. Judging by the fact that relatively few people engage with you I'm guessing I'm not the only one so, if the purpose of posting is to inform or communicate, it seems to me you're failing every bit as much as I do when I "go off on one"

Kyu

It's not the first time that I see that some members of this forum prove some lack of sense of humor.

It is true that I have no skill in philosophy or biology related to atheism as I guess that many of you have.
I am by profession an electrical engineer ,pretty much atracted to phylosophy ,phyisics,hystory and so on and I am a very convinced atheist .
By my knowledge in Judaism , the Hebrew language ,the many books I have read about the Bible of secular interpretation,I guess that only a few members have such knowledge.
I have my own opinion on the mode of proving the inexistence of God and if somebody find the things I write as boring ,it's their problem.
As long as I shall be accepted by the forum ,while sticking to the rules, I shall continue to participate in the discussions inspite of politely hints to sent me to hell.
Reply
RE: Dualism
(July 8, 2009 at 1:11 pm)josef rosenkranz Wrote: It's not the first time that I see that some members of this forum prove some lack of sense of humor.

There was humour in there? Whoosh! Just goes to support what I said ... you're failing to communicate not because I have no sense of humour (I actually have rather a good one, my youngest daughter gets well embarrassed by it at times) but because I completely missed it.

I've nothing against you personally ... I just don't get what the hell it is you're on about.

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Reply
RE: Dualism
(July 8, 2009 at 2:49 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:
(July 8, 2009 at 1:11 pm)josef rosenkranz Wrote: It's not the first time that I see that some members of this forum prove some lack of sense of humor.

There was humour in there? Whoosh! Just goes to support what I said ... you're failing to communicate not because I have no sense of humour (I actually have rather a good one, my youngest daughter gets well embarrassed by it at times) but because I completely missed it.

I've nothing against you personally ... I just don't get what the hell it is you're on about.

Kyu

Thank you for your kindly appreciations .
I think that as member from the beginning of the new forums I have contributed to debates no less than a lot of others.
To be overintelectualized as you said is by no means a fault quite contrary.
I never interfere in a discussion when it deviates from principle problems to personal ones, some times by using foul language which I detest.
I posted a lot of threads which were passionately discussed.

I expressed repeatedly my opinion and extensively elaborated on it that the inexistence of God is proved by the undeniable fact of his creation by man in his own image and that all holy scriptures including the Bible were written by men from political and other "earthly" reasons.
Is this opinion so difficult to get?

Now if you're empowered to bann people from certain reason,according to your personal apreciation then do it.
If not then back off me.Will ye?
Reply
RE: Dualism
(July 10, 2009 at 12:49 pm)josef rosenkranz Wrote: Now if you're empowered to bann people from certain reason,according to your personal apreciation then do it. If not then back off me.Will ye?

Who the hell is talking about banning man? I was just giving you my honest opinion ... that you're failing to communicate based on the fact that very few people engage with you.

And I suppose that answers your question inasmuch as you appear to be asking me to stop saying things like I said (to stop commenting honestly and openly on the posts of others) ... the answer I'm afraid is no.

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Nondualism vs Dualism Won2blv 99 11630 May 7, 2019 at 9:48 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Dualism vs Materialism or Mind vs Soul Raven 31 14715 May 18, 2013 at 1:00 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)