Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 3:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Buddhist atheists
#11
RE: Buddhist atheists
(June 1, 2012 at 1:42 pm)StatCrux Wrote: What on Gods green earth are you rambling on about?

1.Atheism has nothing to do with faith
2.Whether it is your faith that there is no god
3.an atheist with faith is a very shabby creature

Is that your version of lucid thinking? each statement contradicts the other! well done!

I thought chuck was being a little harsh when he called you a moron but I stand corrected. Not a single one of those statements contradicts. If ofcourse you understand them correctly.

Quote:I asked if atheist who happen to also be buddhists have any issues with the fact that buddhism requires faith, as demonstrated in the OP. What your rambling excuse for a chance to insult me was all about I have no idea, incoherent rambling with a bit of abuse ROFLOL

The point which chuck was making, which clearly flew over your head, is that atheism doesn't deal in faith at all. So why a budhists' view would matter in regards to faith is beyond both myself, chuck, and any other people reading this who have a proper understanding of what atheism actually is.
Reply
#12
RE: Buddhist atheists
We do actually have an atheistic Buddhist on this site, but he hasn't come around in a while. Although, how much of an actual Buddhist he is is questionable, because they're not supposed to have that firey temper.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#13
Buddhist atheists
(June 1, 2012 at 1:42 pm)StatCrux Wrote: What on Gods green earth are you rambling on about?

It's rather grey, I'd say he's doing a shit job maintaining it.
Reply
#14
RE: Buddhist atheists
(June 1, 2012 at 2:09 pm)StatCrux Wrote:
Quote:'Mahayana Buddhism is not only intellectual, but it is also devotional ... in Mahayana, Buddha was taken as God, as Supreme Reality itself that descended on the earth in human form for the good of mankind. The concept of Buddha (as equal to God in theistic systems) was never as a creator but as Divine Love that out of compassion (karuna) embodied itself in human form to uplift suffering humanity. He was worshipped with fervent devotion... He represents the Absolute (paramartha satya), devoid of all plurality (sarva-prapancanta-vinirmukta) and has no beginning, middle and end ... Buddha ... is eternal, immutable ... As such He represents Dharmakaya.

I found this interesting, sounds very much like the Christian view of Jesus in many ways.

Perhaps you see one of the sources from which your seedy sect stole its stuff?
Trying to update my sig ...
Reply
#15
RE: Buddhist atheists
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
#16
RE: Buddhist atheists
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
#17
RE: Buddhist atheists
The Buddhists who are not atheists are not adhering to traditional Buddhism. Atheism just means a lack of belief in God and from what I have gathered, there are no gods in traditional Buddhism, but I am sure with the amount of Westerners trying new age religions, they managed to insert a god into their version of the religion.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#18
RE: Buddhist atheists
(June 1, 2012 at 1:56 pm)StatCrux Wrote: Doesn't the six realms of buddhism prove problematic then?

1.God realm
2.Demi-God realm
3.Human realm
4.Animal realm
5.Hungry Ghost realm
6.Hell realm
Look at "Desire Realm" on Wikipedia. The ideas of a "God Realm" and a "Hell Realm" are very different from the conceptions you may be used to.

Quote:Or do atheists just ignore that part? Isn't that cherry picking?
People cherry-pick from Religions all the time. I'm sure you'd find the idea of stoning disobedient children to be abhorrent, even though Jesus called out the religious authorities of his day in Mark 7 for refusing to carry this particular commandment out.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#19
RE: Buddhist atheists
I think Mark 7 was more about the Pharisees adding to the belief system than about the need for stoning.

8 You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.”

9 And he said to them: “You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions! 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’ 11 But you say that if a man says to his father or mother: ‘Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is Corban’ (that is, a gift devoted to God), 12 then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. 13 Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down. And you do many things like that.”
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#20
RE: Buddhist atheists



@Polaris: I believe you are incorrect, as noted in my discussion. But even those gods that are accepted to exist in Buddhisms are not like the god of Judeo-Christian-Islam, they are not omnipotent determiner's of our life, fate and destiny. The gods in Buddhism are no different from lesser mortals such as humans, except that they are much, much more powerful than puny humans. But my understanding is that, traditionally, the gods were no less subject to the wheel of samsara, mortal, and karmically bound. As a matter of fact, the accounts I've read place the gods as less than human in a critical respect. Animals lower than us don't have the necessary stuff, karmically or mentally, to reach nirvana, the extinguishment of reincarnation from where they are; they need to be reincarnated as a human first. And the gods are in a similar position, as being as powerful they are, they don't experience much suffering (dukkha), and their power and invulnerability makes them lazy, and are not really motivated to work towards enlightenment and release in moksha/nirvana; so they too won't reach extinguishment from where they are. Only by being reincarnated as a human do you have a chance of entering the stream (reaching the point of no return), and moving on to enlightenment and nirvana. Now this is obviously a self-serving rationalization, but that is the classic picture as I understand it of gods in Buddhism.

(Again, this is a generalization, and probably only purely applies to one tradition of Buddhism at one time; Buddhism has diversified greatly with time, and I'm not real knowledgeable about the Pure Land Sect (or Nichiren Buddhism), but it seems centered around a god-like Boddhissatva, Amhitaba (sp?), who can basically whisk you off to enlightenment if you say the magic word. And things are not always pure. The figure referred to as the Goddess of Mercy, is sometimes viewed as a mere Boddhissatva, and sometimes as a goddess, and she is claimed in both forms in Buddhism, Taoism and folk religion in China and east Asia. [As a Boddhissatva, she is sometimes referred to as Kwan Yin or Guan Yin, with the appropriate titles, honorifics and such added.])


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)