Your god is a pussy!
July 4, 2012 at 12:15 am
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2012 at 12:23 am by Cinjin.)
A church very near the city I live in here in Michigan burnt to the ground this last week.
What a fucking joke your lazy limp-dicked god is. He's supposedly everywhere, and yet he doesn't even have the ability to stop a little firecracker from burning his own building down. BUT HEY, there is a bright side: Your god just seriously cashed in on a brand new building courtesy of the insurance company.
Kinda makes you think that if Christians claim their god has the power to stop this sort of thing but doesn't, shouldn't they be liable for paying for the whole new building themselves? Lets break it down:
1. Christians claim their god is everywhere, knows all and is indeed all-powerful.
2. Therefore, their god MUST have known that the sparks from the fireworks would indeed burn down the building.
3. Being all-knowing, their god also knew that their new church would be much improved due to the age of the old church.
Result: Their god allowed their church to burn down either for "his own mysterious plan," or he wanted to score himself a big new building.
Either way, the results are all the same. Their god doesn't give a shit about the company who has to pay for the new construction, or the destitute who will lose out on any public outreach efforts the church would've been providing, or the grief of the community who care about the old building. Add to that the fact that god's followers seem perfectly willing to overlook the obvious insurance fraud committed by not only their god but by themselves and you have to ask yourself several more questions...
1. Why do Christians need any insurance??
2. If their god chose to burn down their building, why are they making an insurance company pay for a new one??
3. Wouldn't it be fair to require any religious buffoons to pay for "acts of god" as stated in the clauses of most insurance policies? After all, if he's your god, and he's allowing this to happen, why should he be allowed to capitalize on it???
Basically, it's like saying, "Yeah, we had someone at the church who could've easily stopped the fire, but he didn't - now build us a brand new building."
Article Wrote:In a news release issued Tuesday night, Kentwood Fire Chief Brent Looman says "fireworks were likely a factor in causing the fire."
Investigators say the origin of the fire was the roof in the rear of the church.
What a fucking joke your lazy limp-dicked god is. He's supposedly everywhere, and yet he doesn't even have the ability to stop a little firecracker from burning his own building down. BUT HEY, there is a bright side: Your god just seriously cashed in on a brand new building courtesy of the insurance company.
Kinda makes you think that if Christians claim their god has the power to stop this sort of thing but doesn't, shouldn't they be liable for paying for the whole new building themselves? Lets break it down:
1. Christians claim their god is everywhere, knows all and is indeed all-powerful.
2. Therefore, their god MUST have known that the sparks from the fireworks would indeed burn down the building.
3. Being all-knowing, their god also knew that their new church would be much improved due to the age of the old church.
Result: Their god allowed their church to burn down either for "his own mysterious plan," or he wanted to score himself a big new building.
Either way, the results are all the same. Their god doesn't give a shit about the company who has to pay for the new construction, or the destitute who will lose out on any public outreach efforts the church would've been providing, or the grief of the community who care about the old building. Add to that the fact that god's followers seem perfectly willing to overlook the obvious insurance fraud committed by not only their god but by themselves and you have to ask yourself several more questions...
1. Why do Christians need any insurance??
2. If their god chose to burn down their building, why are they making an insurance company pay for a new one??
3. Wouldn't it be fair to require any religious buffoons to pay for "acts of god" as stated in the clauses of most insurance policies? After all, if he's your god, and he's allowing this to happen, why should he be allowed to capitalize on it???
Basically, it's like saying, "Yeah, we had someone at the church who could've easily stopped the fire, but he didn't - now build us a brand new building."