Posts: 57
Threads: 7
Joined: August 19, 2012
Reputation:
2
Science vs. Religion
November 10, 2012 at 9:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2012 at 9:29 pm by Ocato.)
Here's something I've been thinking about recently:
I hear a lot of people say that science and religion can coexist peacefully but I'm not so sure. I'd like to know what you guys think about it. It seems like religion/religious people will say you're interpreting their "evidence" wrong and it is a non deniable fact. Science is self correcting and will use the most recent information. Religion is also based on faith when science is based on evidence and data. I think science acting as a religion would stop all progress. Any thoughts?
“Music is the only religion that delivers the goods.”-Frank Zappa
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: Science vs. Religion
November 10, 2012 at 11:29 pm
Science is destroying religion and its bullshit lie by lie.
So no, the two cannot co-exist.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Science vs. Religion
November 10, 2012 at 11:43 pm
I don't even know what science acting as a religion even means, quite frankly. Religions rely on the fact that their tenets, dogma, 'teachings' etc are fixed and unchanging. Science is constantly moving and changing as it finds new things to discover. While people can become dogmatic about science to the point where it can seem like worship, that only weakens the definition of "worship" such that football, Star Trek and money become religions.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: Science vs. Religion
November 11, 2012 at 6:23 am
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2012 at 6:24 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Science often conflicts with religion logically but it's possible for the two to not conflict that way. You have to make your interpretation of your religion unfalsifiable though.
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: Science vs. Religion
November 11, 2012 at 8:39 am
No, it leads to PREDICTABILITY, not answers.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Science vs. Religion
November 11, 2012 at 9:00 am
I find that people can rationalise anything given enough time.
If they want to believe something then they will invent a scenerio in which they can seem to be reasonable and still believe in the unresonable.
One thing I have found with theists that there is always a "but what if....." get out of jail free card they can play.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Science vs. Religion
November 11, 2012 at 9:07 am
Predictability? Isn`t that in essence an answere?
Why does the sun go arround the earth? The gravitational force of the sun which has more matter and therefor a bigger gravitational attraction holds the planet in it`s orbit, whilest it`s interaction with the centrifugal force, prevents the planet from leaving this orbit. The planets which themselves have matter also attract the sun which is why under observation the sun seems to "wobble arround" - because it rotates arround various points called the "Barry center".
The theory given for the answere might be a model based on what was observed and calculated, and therefor can be predicted. But in essence it gives a clear answere.
So do other theories and models.
