Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 31, 2025, 3:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheists Wager
#31
RE: Atheists Wager
We live in a universe filled with worlds beyond counting, which has existed for 14 billion years. I find it worth a giggle that a few primates on this insignificant speck of dust have the arrogance to believe they have exclusive access to the truth of all of that.

Talk about taking long odds. Maybe we'll all see each other in some alien god's version of hell.
Reply
#32
RE: Atheists Wager
(December 12, 2012 at 4:19 am)CliveStaples Wrote:
(December 11, 2012 at 9:05 am)LastPoet Wrote:


Oh, no, that's not what I'm getting at. I don't think that morality is a subset of theology--that is, that the only way to get to objective moral values is by way of theism.

Maybe that's true, and maybe it isn't--I am strongly inclined to think that it is false--but it's not what I'm getting at.


The point I'm making is that you can't get an "ought" (prescriptive values) from an "is" (understanding the physical states of the universe). Science doesn't get you to morality. No less an atheist than David Hume argued the same.


You are a bright guy, Clive I give you that, yet, you should know that magic and wishfull gods just does not cut it. I would be the first guy to accept the god you are preaching for if it would be made present to us humans, yet it hides from us. what is it's point? Look at all the christian denominations.
Reply
#33
RE: Atheists Wager
Golden rule.
Silver rule.

Human morality predates the abrahamic religions. This supports the idea that biology inspired morality. Do we know how EXACTLY? Nope. So until someone comes up with a satisfactory explanation I'll continue to run by that which makes the most sense; extrapolating to others what I would perceive to be good.

Would I want it done to/for me? If the answer is yes, it's PROBABLY good. But if it is questionable by, say, the norms of society, then I must beg permission of the other first lest I do them harm, since again...that is what I would want others to do if in doubt. If the answer is no, then I'm not gonna fucking do it because chances are it'd be bad.

Would I want someone to shank me? No. Then I'm not gonna shank someone else. Would I want to be raped? No. I'm not gonna rape. Would I want to be murdered? No. So I'm not gonna murder.

Would I want someone to make out with me? Maybe. If they ask permission. So I would ask permission.

Would I want someone to give me food if I was starving? Yes? Then I'll give someone who is starving food.

Morality is subjective and the best we can do is apply it subjectively with consideration to the sapience and sentience of other beings.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Let's play Pascals wager expanded edition dyresand 4 2201 September 24, 2015 at 6:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  If atheists treated Christians like many Christians treat atheists... StealthySkeptic 24 12281 August 25, 2014 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: Darkstar
  Pascal's wager: Why is anyone dumb enough to use it Lemonvariable72 6 3785 May 12, 2014 at 11:27 am
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  Pascal's wager redux..... max-greece 23 8837 September 16, 2013 at 9:10 am
Last Post: ManMachine
  What should replace Pascal's wager in my opinion. Mystic 34 18561 August 29, 2012 at 4:53 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Irritation with "meaningless life" claims and "Pascal's Wager"... hoppimike 14 6545 June 22, 2012 at 4:17 pm
Last Post: hoppimike



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)