Bald Prophets are Dangerous

[RichardP]

Oh, you're one clever little bastard, aren't you? If there's one thing that Libertarians can do much better than Christians it's backing up their arguments. If you can explain to me one Libertarian argument that attacks what somebody said and ignores the basis of why it was said, please tell me.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-16669-page-6.html Post 60 the last two paragraphs.

I will explain my viewpoint better. I believe that people should be free to set up their own website and run it in the manner that they choose. It's like private property. It's their website, they get to make the rules.

This freedom, this liberty, is not worldwide. In China, in certain parts of the Middle East, certain websites are forbidden (Like Facebook in China).

It seems that your argument is against free speech. You seem to be arguing that websites like this should not be allowed to exist. And you seem to be arguing that people should not be allowed to criticize certain ideas and books.

Your total and complete reverence of the Bible is what sets you apart ideologically from us. We don't view the Bible as a reference that you can use to defend a position.

The argument that one thing in the Bible is "proven" by something else in the Bible is meaningless to us.

[Brakeman]

.. Or are you so far up his poop chute to notice you blind following?

lol Now there's some of that christian love I've come to know.
..
Clearly I can see you've learned much from your lord and Savior. lmao. :eyeroll:

You should have seen him before Jesus worked on him! If the son of god in all his infinite goodness can only get a christian as good as Drich, then what does that say about his "infinite power and wisdom?"

[Drich]

[Surtr]

http://atheistforums.org/thread-16669-page-6.html Post 60 the last two paragraphs.

That's not what I asked. I asked you to provide me with a Libertarian argument that attacks the idea and not the basis of it and you give me some guy saying that he was a Libertarian and liked free speech.

Show me where cinjin or Minnie has quoted any reference material to support one thing they said against something I have said, in this thread.

The entire first page. Could you name in this thread where you have quoted reference material?

done now what?

[Drich]

That's not what I asked. I asked you to provide me with a Libertarian argument that attacks the idea and not the basis of it and you give me some guy saying that he was a Libertarian and liked free speech.

If He is a libertarian would this not be an example of what you asked? After the only reason I am speaking to you about this is because of this guys claim to be a libertairian. If you do not think he is repersenting libertairianism then your arguement is not with me. For if you remember you responded to me mocking him for his 'libertian views.'

Show me where cinjin or Minnie has quoted any reference material to support one thing they said against something I have said, in this thread.

The entire first page.

Maybe you did not understand the request. I said Show me when those two offered reference material (when prompted) against something I said. "The whole first page," is dedicated to a literal english reading of 2 kings. Something I have not apposed.

Could you name in this thread where you have quoted reference material?

Show me where someone has asked for it. If I just start spouting random verses to support everything I say it is considered "preaching" on this site. Which is a banable offence. So in order for me to "preach" from the bible one of you needs to ask for Book Chapter and verse..

Show me anywhere where someone has asked for book Chapter and verse, and I did not snap up the chance to preach out a sermon. (and I will fix it right away!)

[Minimalist]

Again minnie show me.

Easy. Post #31 in this very thread.

Again Elisha only call down a curse on them it was up to God to do the actual smiting. He chose 2 Female bears to slaughter 42 Young people.

You are a sanctimonious prick.

Not because this ridiculous story ever happened but because you look at it and feel very righteous about yourself.

You are worse than a sanctimonious prick. You are a stupid sanctimonious prick.

[Surtr]

If He is a libertarian would this not be an example of what you asked? After the only reason I am speaking to you about this is because of this guys claim to be a libertairian. If you do not think he is repersenting libertairianism then your arguement is not with me. For if you remember you responded to me mocking him for his 'libertian views.'

What the hell are you talking about? Are you so stupid you can't answer a simple question like that?

If I just start spouting random verses to support everything I say it is considered "preaching" on this site. Which is a banable offence. So in order for me to "preach" from the bible one of you needs to ask for Book Chapter and verse..

If you have a verse to back up your argument, using it is not preaching.

[Drich]

[Surtr]

If you do not know what i am speak of, then how do you know your question has not been answered?

I've asked you the same question twice. If you're unable to come up with a legitimate answer (as your last one showed you did not understand the question), it's your own fault.

What is my arguement in this thread that needs scriptural backing?

You claimed that using bible verses to support your argument is considered preaching. It's not. That's it.

[Minimalist]

Do you not understand the Hebrew usage of the term young people?

Don't start this shit again. Reputable translators have repeatedly used the phrase "children" or "young boys" or "little fuckheads" for that matter.
The point is that your fucking 'god' sends a couple of bears to KILL THEM.

I suspect you should focus on little more on that and a little less on trying to get your fucking god off the hook for murdering children, dickhead.

I repeat, you are a sanctimonious prick.

Fuck your god.