Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:12 pm
(January 21, 2013 at 9:59 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote: Then that person would be a free-thinker, unlike you.
Maybe.
I would like to know what the fuck is so "free thinking" about raping a child?!
The again, you are the cunt who gave the pedo or troll or what ever the fuck he is, his only kudos! Which wouldnt be so bad, if it werent for a post in which he tries to justify childrape!
Posts: 1302
Threads: 13
Joined: October 11, 2012
Reputation:
19
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:15 pm
(January 21, 2013 at 10:12 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: I would like to know what the fuck is so "free thinking" about raping a child?! Strong emotion.
Quote:The again, you are the cunt who gave the pedo or troll or what ever the fuck he is, his only kudos! Which wouldnt be so bad, if it werent for a post in which he tries to justify childrape!
Wait, did I? Link me. I don't even know who we're (you're) talking about.
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:21 pm
http://atheistforums.org/thread-16047-po...#pid371940
so are you going to delet your kudos now?
You remind me about a little shitwit of a human being who used to hang arround womens restrooms in the Bar`s in Hamburg cities St. Pauli street, always scremin "You wanna fuck", at one point someone had enought and simply fed him his own teeth.
Your constant post of "you phaggot" "do ya lift" "you dumb hahahaha" "fat people are horrible" and other worthless shit are just like that, annoying useless information, you are like a fly flying arrround my face which I am unable to slap.
Just fuck off and stop annoying me you worthless piece of shit!
Posts: 1302
Threads: 13
Joined: October 11, 2012
Reputation:
19
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:23 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2013 at 10:26 pm by Gilgamesh.)
(January 21, 2013 at 10:21 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: so are you going to delet your kudos now? If I gave someone kudo's, it's because I agree with them. What people think of the content in the post I give kudos is irrelevant to me.
Edit: Nope, definitely not going to remove that one.
By the way, I thought that guy was a troll since the beginning.
Quote:You remind me about a little shitwit of a human being who used to hang arround womens restrooms in the Bar`s in Hamburg cities St. Pauli street, always scremin "You wanna fuck", at one point someone had enought and simply fed him his own teeth.
Your constant post of "you phaggot" "do ya lift" "you dumb hahahaha" "fat people are horrible" and other worthless shit are just like that, annoying useless information, you are like a fly flying arrround my face which I am unable to slap.
Just fuck off and stop annoying me you worthless piece of shit!
umad?
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:25 pm
So you agree that it`s alright to have sex with a child?
Posts: 1302
Threads: 13
Joined: October 11, 2012
Reputation:
19
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:27 pm
(January 21, 2013 at 10:25 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: So you agree that it`s alright to have sex with a child? Nope.
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:30 pm
(January 21, 2013 at 10:27 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote: (January 21, 2013 at 10:25 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: So you agree that it`s alright to have sex with a child? Nope.
soooo? what is this:
(January 21, 2013 at 10:23 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote: Edit: Nope, definitely not going to remove that one.
mhmm I guess you are simply playing the confused fool now.
I am really interested. Why give a post kudos which tries to justify the rape of children?
Quote:By the way, I thought that guy was a troll since the beginning.
ohh yeah, and I am suddently santa.
and even if, Why to a post which tries to justify the rape of children?
Posts: 1302
Threads: 13
Joined: October 11, 2012
Reputation:
19
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:33 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2013 at 10:34 pm by Gilgamesh.)
(January 21, 2013 at 10:30 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: soooo? what is this:
(January 21, 2013 at 10:23 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote: Edit: Nope, definitely not going to remove that one.
mhmm I guess you are simply playing the confused fool now.
I am really interested. Why give a post kudos which tries to justify the rape of children? That's me giving kudos to a post which says sex with someone who's gone through puberty is A-okay.
Quote:Quote:By the way, I thought that guy was a troll since the beginning.
ohh yeah, and I am suddently santa.
and even if, Why to a post which tries to justify the rape of children?
See my above response.
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:40 pm
he states in his post:
(December 9, 2012 at 1:24 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote: Response:
A pedophile is one who has sex with children.
A child is one who has not reached puberty.
Muhammad had sex with someone who was mature and reached maturity.
Muhammad is not a pedophile.
REACHED puperty.
A child reached puperty at the age of 11 !!!!
He condoles sex with someone who is just 11 years old.
no english?
Posts: 1302
Threads: 13
Joined: October 11, 2012
Reputation:
19
RE: Question on freedom to voice support for criminal actions?
January 21, 2013 at 10:49 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2013 at 10:51 pm by Gilgamesh.)
(January 21, 2013 at 10:40 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: REACHED puperty.A child reached puperty at the age of 11 !!!!
He condoles sex with someone who is just 11 years old.
no english? Someone who is far enough along in puberty to the point where they want sex, who knows how to have safe sex and who is also mature enough mentally to not be taken advantage of. The person I just described can be young - and it's okay to have consensual sex with this person, from a moral standpoint, anyway. I think the law should still go by date because having a law that applies based on subjectivity isn't a good thing, though.
|