Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 18, 2024, 7:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Firearms
#1
Firearms
I find it rather ridiculous that some far-left, radical liberals find a ban on assult rifles to be nessassary to combat violence in the United States. Yet the reality of scenarios evidences the fact that further restrictions and prohibitions of people's access to arms doesn't do much to improve their behaviors.
In the year 2012, only around one-hundred fifty (with the shooters counted if killed) of a number over eleven-thousand gun deaths were the result of mass shootings.
Alongside that, leftist media corperations enjoy reporting events such as the Colorado Theater Shooting or the Sandy Hook Shooting for two main reasons-to gain revenue through advertising and to sway viewers to their agendas.
With those facts known, many gun-control advocates tend to draw western European nations as reasons by which legislators and other government bodies should have the right to trample upon whatever sections of the United States Constitution that its members feel are nesasary to. Many of these people forget to mention that the average man in countries such as England, Denmark, and Geramny tend to have a higher income and educational level than most Americans do, and also have universal healhcare systems in which those who suffer from mental illnesses can be treated more effecivly in the United States.
Reply
#2
RE: Firearms
Fire arms!!!!!!!!!!

[Image: wbSTUNT_wideweb__470x334,0.jpg]
Cunt
Reply
#3
RE: Firearms
I agree that mass shootings are rare, but I still don't see why anyone, a hunting enthusiast, average joe, or simply anyone needs a military grade rifle with a magazine that allows the shooter to fire a shit ton of rounds.
Reply
#4
RE: Firearms
(March 21, 2013 at 4:03 pm)C3P0 Wrote: In the year 2012, only around one-hundred and fifty (with the shooters counted if killed) of a number over eleven-thousand gun deaths were the result of mass shootings.
You're a dangerously insane fucknut.
Reply
#5
RE: Firearms
This is worth noting too:
Quote:The US Department of Justice reports that approximately 60% of all adult firearm deaths are by suicide, 61% more than deaths by homicide.[22]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violenc...ted_States

So… 11,000 gun deaths, that makes 6,600 gun suicides.
Reply
#6
RE: Firearms
There is such a thing as reducing the total number of firearms in our population.

You know, to reduce the ease of use for murder and suicide. It won't solve them all immediately, but it could put a damper on it.

That and unifying gun control legislation to ensure criminal and psychological background checks are done on a federal level.

But gun nuts are so fucking delusional that any step, even if it doesn't change the number of guns significantly, cry like little bitches and denounce it as "treason".

Yeah, it's treasonous to consider preventing another mentally ill Jared Loughner from getting some handguns and unloading it into a crowd.

What a fucking farce.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#7
RE: Firearms
Better gun laws does not equal "trampling" of constitutional rights. Quit listening to Fox News.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#8
RE: Firearms
Tell it to the 20 dead kids in Connecticut.
Reply
#9
RE: Firearms
(March 21, 2013 at 6:02 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: Better gun laws does not equal "trampling" of constitutional rights. Quit listening to Fox News.

Not according to golden rod!

Apparently, guns solve everything (let's ignore they're used in the violence they supposedly protect against)...

Shoutbox Wrote:[x] C3P0 » Spekaing truthfully, I absolutely DESPISE those radical liberals who wish to remove firearms from the market. Mexico has a law rendering guns as illegal objects, yet the Cartels own plenty of them! Regarding mass shootings, plenty of leftist media corporations like to report upon gun violence in order to sway the viewers to their views. If what happpened in Connecticut last December occured in the 1940's, the most coverage the event would recieve would be from a local newspaper.

Yes, because we can compare the US to a failed state fueled by US drug money and armed by US gun trafficking.

And in the history of the United States, no one has ever conspired to suppress news in order to facilitate a view.

Oh. Wait.

That's what Threepio is advocating.

Idiot fourteen year old turd.

I'm not surprised to see this though, coming from the same genius who wants to poo-poo his generation and use corporal punishment in schools to make them study better. /s
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#10
RE: Firearms
Any time someone says "leftist media" I immediate write them off as a fucktard, no exceptions.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Printing firearms. Something completely different 3 1048 March 18, 2013 at 1:07 pm
Last Post: Autumnlicious



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)