Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 5:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
#21
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
Godschild, I have a question. Can you lay out just whAt you believe, please, or link me to that thread? All I ever see from you is, "dont put words into my mouth!" or one liner bible propagandas. Oh! or definition descriptions. Oh! or fleeting thoughts of vindication at the existance of Hell. Oh! or just not even answering questions, like, ever.

Do you have anywhere or anything that is original? Words from yOur mouth examining something rather than answering as if you were the bible itself?

Just wondering.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
#22
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Godschild Wrote: People can only commit a certain number of sins before they die, however those sins are eternal unless they have been forgiven, thus eternal punishment (not torture) for eternal sins.

Basicly, sins are eternal (forever, unending, etc), except when they're not?

ROFLOL
Reply
#23
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 26, 2013 at 8:08 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: This was from another thread:

It's good to put in yourself in position of another, and ask what you think is the right thing to do with regards to yourself, and apply it to others.
If you were evil, would it be the right thing to have compassion yourself and hope you are forgiven and reformed or eternally tortured?
I believe it's the former.
Therefore I believe it's right to wish others compassion and they not be eternally tortured but forgiven and reformed.
Therefore I believe if there is a Creator that shares morality of humanity, it would be wrong of him to eternally torture humans for being evil.

but i can prove to you that eternal punishment is logical in some occasions

it is like this, peole who deserve to go to paradise, go to paradise
people who deserve to go to hell go to hell,

and there is 2 categories of people in hell, those who shall stay in hell for a certain period of time and then go out and go in to Paradise

and some will stay forever, but how can you justify eternal punishment if person sinned for 60 years for example, what is 60 years compared to eternity?

God said in quran that he is just, and he will never punish unjustly. so when he say punish eternaly, let say that he punish this person 60 years in hell, and he cause him to die in hell and stay forever in hell, so actually he is punished forever beacuse he will never go to paradise and he stay dead in hell, without feeling pain.

but there is also other options, like if you sinned for 60 years, and you distracted another person from beleiving in God, you made this person become atheist. so you will be punished for you and for him also beacuse you missguided him in life, so if you lived 60 years and this person also 60 years, then you probabaly stay 120 in punishments in hell. then can you imagine how long period of time you will stay in hell if you missguide many people.
Reply
#24
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
I do not believe in the concept of Hell. Therefore, it is very difficult for me to contemplate why one would consider "logical" scenarios in regards to one not being sent there.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#25
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
I recall that the Catholic position on hell is that it's self-inflicted for the most part. Sin is defined by the RCC as a willful turning away from the grace of God. Now, God loves us and wants us to repent and come back to Him but it's our own pride that keeps us away and feeling empty and thus, suffering. We could apparently repent and be forgiven at any time as long as it was sincere.

If I were to use an example, it would be Dante's depiction of Lucifer who is encased in ice in the lowest circle of hell and is eternally frantically beating his wings to try and escape. The irony is that it's the winds caused by his flapping wings that continually renews the ice that holds him and prevents him from leaving. If he had simply let go of his pride and repented, he would have been forgiven long ago.

Although, maybe the above was just a product of the second Vatican reform. It's not that I believe any of it, but I like to at least be aware of what the other side preaches.
Reply
#26
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 27, 2013 at 4:12 am)LastPoet Wrote:
(March 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Godschild Wrote: People can only commit a certain number of sins before they die, however those sins are eternal unless they have been forgiven, thus eternal punishment (not torture) for eternal sins.

Basicly, sins are eternal (forever, unending, etc), except when they're not?

ROFLOL

Please tell me you are not that unreasoning.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#27
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 27, 2013 at 2:32 am)missluckie26 Wrote: Godschild, I have a question. Can you lay out just whAt you believe, please, or link me to that thread? All I ever see from you is, "dont put words into my mouth!" or one liner bible propagandas. Oh! or definition descriptions. Oh! or fleeting thoughts of vindication at the existance of Hell. Oh! or just not even answering questions, like, ever.

Do you have anywhere or anything that is original? Words from yOur mouth examining something rather than answering as if you were the bible itself?

Just wondering.

At first I was not going to answer such an inconsiderate bunch of dribble, at a second glance I decided you need to see the truth.
First, why do you pick out small segments of what I post and make it into something it's not, to me that's lying.
Second, I have nothing original but not for the reasons you want others to believe, the scriptures are thousands of years old and have said the same thing down through the ages.
Third,I answer all questions that I can (have time for) or believe is worth the time.
Forth, you should grow up and let go of your hatred for Christians who do not compromise their beliefs, we've done nothing to you, except maybe care about your soul.
Fifth, when I answer I give what I honestly believe, just because you do not agree with it doesn't make it wrong.
Now here's what I believe about hell, anyone who rejects Jesus as their Lord and savior will be in hell by their own decision, it's as simple as that, it's written all over the NT. Hell is a dark place and a place of self inflicted torment. The fire the scriptures speak of is to give man an idea of what hell will be like, why, because man could not understand what it would be like to go through eternity without the love of God and the hatred one builds in one's self in hell. In this life God's love is with you everyday whether you want it or not. You experience it even though you do not realize it and not to realize it IMO is sad. Life in hell will not be burning and torture, a person will be all alone in hell, no one to comfort you from your hatred for God, to comfort you from your loneliness. You will find no relief from the sounds of those suffering their self inflicted torment, yes, you will hear the torment of others forever, yet you will see no one, loneliness and hatred will be your only companion. This suffering is your's and your's alone it belongs to you because you will make it, it doesn't have to be this way though. I could go on but you should get an idea of what I believe.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#28
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Godschild Wrote:
(March 26, 2013 at 8:41 pm)Justtristo Wrote: True, however if you like me has gotten to know the character of Yahweh/Jesus in the Bible. You come to the conclusion that Yahweh/Jesus (I am convinced they are one and the same) is enough of a sadistic prick to inflict eternal punishment (including babies and possibly foetuses) on people. However the sort of god a lot of Christians believe in would do inflict eternal punishment, temporary punishment or simply annihilation yes, eternal no. Because such an entity knows that one can only commit a finite number of sins in their lifetime.

People can only commit a certain number of sins before they die, however those sins are eternal unless they have been forgiven, thus eternal punishment (not torture) for eternal sins.

This does not make any sense, especially given the descriptions of what hell is like in the New Testament. If what happens in hell according to the New Testament is not torture, I don't know what is.
undefined
Reply
#29
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Godschild Wrote: People can only commit a certain number of sins before they die, however those sins are eternal unless they have been forgiven, thus eternal punishment (not torture) for eternal sins.

Someone commits a minor crime, and that crime is on their criminal record for life. Therefore, whatever that crime may be, it is certainly deserving of life in prison, no?
Reply
#30
RE: My reasoning in rejecting eternal torture/hell...
(March 27, 2013 at 6:39 pm)Justtristo Wrote:
(March 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Godschild Wrote: People can only commit a certain number of sins before they die, however those sins are eternal unless they have been forgiven, thus eternal punishment (not torture) for eternal sins.

This does not make any sense, especially given the descriptions of what hell is like in the New Testament. If what happens in hell according to the New Testament is not torture, I don't know what is.

Did you read my response to missluckie26, that is how I see hell, it answers some questions I use to have about hell. Know this, hell could be just as described in scripture. The statements about hell in scripture do not seem to add up to a firey hell. I spent years working this out and what I believe does not include torture, nor fire, however it is in my opinion worse than the hell described in scripture, when one knows the love of God then one could understand why it would be hell without it. Scripture does say that all will come into the presence of God the Father and at that time God's love will be known to those who have condemned themselves, so they will also know what it will means to be without His love.
If you are questioning the sin, all things wrong are first against God and without His forgiveness of those sin they continue on for eternity. A wrong against an eternal God, is an eternal sin, without forgiveness, thus an eternal punishment. This is what scripture tells us, everything I stated in this paragraph can be found in scripture, please remember I studied this for a long time, so if you have a disagreement with it I will need proof.

(March 27, 2013 at 6:54 pm)Darkstar Wrote:
(March 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm)Godschild Wrote: People can only commit a certain number of sins before they die, however those sins are eternal unless they have been forgiven, thus eternal punishment (not torture) for eternal sins.

Someone commits a minor crime, and that crime is on their criminal record for life. Therefore, whatever that crime may be, it is certainly deserving of life in prison, no?

God has told us what sin is and the punishment it deserves, if you want to argue this you need to get outside and shout to heaven your complaint, no matter what I say or you say to me, we can not change what God deems just.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HELL or not HELL? Little Rik 91 15072 November 10, 2018 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Eternal bliss Cod 135 20322 September 6, 2018 at 10:43 am
Last Post: Bob Kelso
  Why doesn't hell in Islam and Christianity have Cold as torture? Spixri 33 10262 April 7, 2017 at 10:05 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Nature's reasoning for religion... maestroanth 4 1665 May 20, 2016 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Eternal Damnation Hungry Hungry Hippo 14 5538 August 15, 2015 at 4:39 am
Last Post: Hungry Hungry Hippo
  Free Will and Loving/Rejecting God Nope 126 32900 January 26, 2015 at 9:38 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  An eternal life is a worthless life. Lucanus 47 14004 December 24, 2014 at 5:11 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The more you attend Church, the more likely you are so support Torture. CapnAwesome 111 19005 December 23, 2014 at 6:53 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Eternal punishment is pointless. Ryantology 497 74988 December 5, 2014 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  God is not the only eternal one ! (if he exist) reality.Mathematician 16 3840 June 19, 2014 at 3:06 am
Last Post: reality.Mathematician



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)