Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 6:42 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Ontological reverse

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Ontological reverse
max-greece Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation: 39
#1
Ontological reverse
November 11, 2013 at 2:24 pm
Nothing that exists is perfect.
God is perfect.

Therefore God doesn't exist.


I thank you.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
Find
Reply
Captain Colostomy Offline
Holey Shitbag
***
Religious Views: Full of shit.
Posts: 2171
Threads: 4
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 33
#2
RE: Ontological reverse
November 11, 2013 at 2:35 pm
TL;DR, you verbose bastard. Smile
Find
Reply
c172 Offline
Uppity.
*****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 10470
Threads: 165
Joined: May 29, 2013
Reputation: 53
#3
RE: Ontological reverse
November 11, 2013 at 2:37 pm
I thought this was about cancer at first. My eyes are failing me.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Find
Reply
LastPoet Offline
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)
*****
Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Posts: 18504
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation: 125
#4
RE: Ontological reverse
November 11, 2013 at 2:37 pm
You have to have Faith™.
Find
Reply
T.J. Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: n/A
Posts: 770
Threads: 37
Joined: November 2, 2013
Reputation: 22
#5
RE: Ontological reverse
November 11, 2013 at 2:48 pm
(November 11, 2013 at 2:24 pm)max-greece Wrote: God is perfect.

They must not have had high standards for perfection back then...
[Image: Ip4ZfOm.png]
TJ's Reviews YouTube Channel!
Find
Reply
max-greece Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation: 39
#6
RE: Ontological reverse
November 11, 2013 at 2:52 pm (This post was last modified: November 11, 2013 at 3:12 pm by max-greece.)
(November 11, 2013 at 2:35 pm)Captain Colostomy Wrote: TL;DR, you verbose bastard. Smile

Learnt that lesson long ago.
(November 11, 2013 at 2:48 pm)ToriJ Wrote:
(November 11, 2013 at 2:24 pm)max-greece Wrote: God is perfect.

They must not have had high standards for perfection back then...

OK ToriJ,

Just for you:

Nothing that exists is perfect.

Therefore if you believe God exists, he isn't perfect.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
Find
Reply
Angrboda Offline
Bringer Of Grief
*****
Religious Views: Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi. You’re my only hope.
Posts: 28335
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation: 159
#7
RE: Ontological reverse
November 12, 2013 at 8:15 am (This post was last modified: November 12, 2013 at 8:27 am by Angrboda.)



Just because I am here:

Nothing that you know of that exists is perfect.

Rephrasing: m elements of a set containing m+n element have property ~P'.

Either:
i) all m+n elements are ~P', God has property ~~P', therefore God is not a member
ii) there is a probability that all elements are ~P', based on the values of m, n, and m+n, and therefore if God has property ~~P', there is a certain related probability that God is not a member of the set.

I believe the latter is okay, while the former equivocates by treating a conclusion based on inductive inference as being one formed by deductive inference. The conclusion is not deductively sound. I believe that is the main matter. Correct me if I'm wrong.

(ETA: It was nice of our resident critic of philosophy, LP, to weigh in with a red herring. The fact that you must have faith to believe in it is in no way necessarily related to whether or not the proposition of His existence is itself true.)

[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Find
Reply
LastPoet Offline
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)
*****
Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Posts: 18504
Threads: 79
Joined: May 29, 2010
Reputation: 125
#8
RE: Ontological reverse
November 12, 2013 at 8:19 am
Buzzkiller! Big Grin
Find
Reply
Doubting Thomas Offline
El Conquistador
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation: 45
#9
RE: Ontological reverse
November 12, 2013 at 4:41 pm
The idea of God being omnipotent is illogical.
If logic exists, then God couldn't exist
Therefore, pancakes are tasty.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Find
Reply
max-greece Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2177
Threads: 45
Joined: June 5, 2013
Reputation: 39
#10
RE: Ontological reverse
November 12, 2013 at 5:26 pm
(November 12, 2013 at 8:15 am)apophenia Wrote:


Just because I am here:

Nothing that you know of that exists is perfect.

Rephrasing: m elements of a set containing m+n element have property ~P'.

Either:
i) all m+n elements are ~P', God has property ~~P', therefore God is not a member
ii) there is a probability that all elements are ~P', based on the values of m, n, and m+n, and therefore if God has property ~~P', there is a certain related probability that God is not a member of the set.

I believe the latter is okay, while the former equivocates by treating a conclusion based on inductive inference as being one formed by deductive inference. The conclusion is not deductively sound. I believe that is the main matter. Correct me if I'm wrong.

(ETA: It was nice of our resident critic of philosophy, LP, to weigh in with a red herring. The fact that you must have faith to believe in it is in no way necessarily related to whether or not the proposition of His existence is itself true.)


I'm arguing that existence and perfection are mutually exclusive. Existence guarantees imperfection - as follows:

To be perfect you would have to have every particle that constitutes you be perfect. As soon as we get down to the electron level, however, we can't even know the combination of where an electron is and which way it is going. At any moment in time, therefore, our perfect entity could be short one electron and therefore not be perfect.

I'd like to thank Mythos Beers for their assistance in the making of this argument.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Ontological reverse

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 1236 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Trying to Apply the Ontological Argument in Real Life YahwehIsTheWay 21 4803 April 13, 2017 at 5:13 pm
Last Post: Lek
  Someone actually tried to use the ontological argument on me... max-greece 8 2794 October 21, 2013 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: Brian37



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)