Aleph Bet and DNA

[StrongWaters]

The 'I Am' in you cannot end. Your body is a bio-mechanical machine that is designed. You wear it. YOU, however, are only entangled to it.

Genesis 3

21 The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. 22 And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”

The coat of skin has been made as a garment. Where are YOU?

Matthew 3

10 “See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father in heaven.

Below, you are the child in the garment. Above, you are the Angel facing God. The veil over the temple / template keeps you from seeing the Holy of Holies. Symbolism is the only way for man to eventually see this.

Why are you a beast in the Water? Aleph Mem (Mother)



To find Truth. Aleph Mem Tav (TRUTH)



Coming to the cross is the account ledger cleared. There is no mistaking this evidence. It is crystal clear.

Assertions and conclusions based on subjective interpretation.

No evidence. Sorry SW, but by now you should begin to realise that we don't accept mere assertion or belief as evidence.

Also, plugging your blog isn't going to convince us if you yourself are failing to that end.

The roots of language are symmetrical to the laws of nature. The language is invariant and translational, just as the laws of physics they mirror. You will have a hard time denying the proof I show you in the mirror. Eventually, the mirror on the wall tells the Queen the truth. Careful who you listen to. Aleph Bet is your proof. Bet Nun (House of Seed) is the seed you are wearing. God deserves our reverence.

---

The 'I Am' in you cannot end. Your body is a bio-mechanical machine that is designed. You wear it. YOU, however, are only entangled to it.

Might sound like a nice idea, but there's no evidence such an event occurs.
So far, all evidence we have points to "us" (whatever that's supposed to mean) ceasing to exist when our body dies.

And quoting a book that says otherwise is not evidence to the contrary in and of itself, it must be backed up by outside sources. Otherwise, every holy book is just as valid as yours as to explaining what happens after death.

Patently false. Baptism has evidence. You MUST be born again. Involution and evolution are observable. Science has evolution down. It misses involution because it denies the possibility.

NDE Accounts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drfKGqLY9Z8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S_Tg4-_WVk

[LostLocke]

Patently false. Baptism has evidence.

The only evidence baptism provides is that your head will get wet when doused with, or submerged in, water.

[WesOlsen]

God damn what a load of dellusional rambling crap. You addressed precisely fuck all from my response, which is that not only do you not understand molecular biology but that you've made some wild and highly subjective comparisons between DNA, which IS CIPHER, NOT TRUE LANGUAGE and some fucking Hebrew, which is just a fucking human language that evolved from some proto-semitic language group. All you've done is try and win the 'who can type the most shit' contest by pasting in endless bible quotes and rattle on about the light and holograms. This is easily amongst the most delluded stuff i've witnessed on this forum yet, the leaps of logic are baffling and it's really hard to even suss what you're yapping on about most of the time.

Bible quotes don't win arguments, because they are proof of nothing. As already stated, god didn't say shit, men said shit (and lots of it). The bible is a collection of claims, not evidence for claims. DNA does not follow a power law, it is not a language and your comparison of DNA/sperm and hebrew is retarded. These thoughts aren't shared by anyone in the scientific world, nobody in my lab would even give this rubbish a second thought because the connections are far too loose and irrational. If you presented this garbage, which is essentially jazzed up numerology wank, to any molecular pathology journal you'd be the laughing stock of the community. You may as well try to convince us that tree trunk rings are a true language. Complete and utter gibberish.

[StrongWaters]

Patently false. Baptism has evidence.

The only evidence baptism provides is that your head will get wet when doused with, or submerged in, water.

You ignore the second video. There was no way for that child to know the details of what he remembered. This is proof, although these stories have existed for centuries. Evidence is not lacking. This is a well documented and studied topic. PHDs write books on the subject and study this topic over long careers. Books are available for this and out of body experiences that cannot be explained by logic and science. You are dead in the water with our pretext. You know it to be true. Ignorance ignores truth.

---

God damn what a load of dellusional rambling crap. You addressed precisely fuck all from my response, which is that not only do you not understand molecular biology but that you've made some wild and highly subjective comparisons between DNA, which IS CIPHER, NOT TRUE LANGUAGE and some fucking Hebrew, which is just a fucking human language that evolved from some proto-semitic language group. All you've done is try and win the 'who can type the most shit' contest by pasting in endless bible quotes and rattle on about the light and holograms. This is easily amongst the most delluded stuff i've witnessed on this forum yet, the leaps of logic are baffling and it's really hard to even suss what you're yapping on about most of the time.

Bible quotes don't win arguments, because they are proof of nothing. As already stated, god didn't say shit, men said shit (and lots of it). The bible is a collection of claims, not evidence for claims. DNA does not follow a power law, it is not a language and your comparison of DNA/sperm and hebrew is retarded. These thoughts aren't shared by anyone in the scientific world, nobody in my lab would even give this rubbish a second thought because the connections are far too loose and irrational. If you presented this garbage, which is essentially jazzed up numerology wank, to any molecular pathology journal you'd be the laughing stock of the community. You may as well try to convince us that tree trunk rings are a true language. Complete and utter gibberish.

What's in the well comes up in the bucket. I cannot show you truth if you cling to error.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Well, all I can repeat is that a proof by assertion fallacy is not evidence, SW. Do with that information what you will, but fallacious reasoning won't convince anyone here.

[Jacob(smooth)]

 out of body experiences that cannot be explained by logic and science.

Ok, lemme try.


Ahem.

[StrongWaters]

Well, all I can repeat is that a proof by assertion fallacy is not evidence, SW. Do with that information what you will, but fallacious reasoning won't convince anyone here.

Between two bits of information, this might be true. With this assertion, there are 66 books, 22 letters and 4500 words that show up at least once, and ALL of them says the same story from top to bottom. Of those words, there are one, two, three and four letter roots that branch into the larger context for the single letter. No other language does this in the same way (Tree of Knowledge). Those branches then sprout fruit in all the other languages (Babel). Again, there is a root to our knowledge and it is traceable to Hebrew and Greek. Two become one. This can be observed and demonstrated.

Bits of information are compared. Assertions are made and can be falsified. Not so with this assertion. There is a cloud of witness in all directions, all of which point directly to the Aleph Mem Tav. Truth has strength or it is death (Mem Tav).

[WesOlsen]

What's in the well comes up in the bucket. I cannot show you truth if you cling to error.

For someone so obsessed with the deep poetic majesty of language, your poetry is bloody dreadful. It is YOU who cling to a vague golden-age notion of divine beauty where there is none. If you want a real education in language, don't study DNA because it isn't true language. If you want to learn about science, using the accepted evidence-based technique, then go study it for a few years and then we'll see who's shitting truth out of their cakehole. We can't show you truth if you cling to superstitious rubbish.

God didn't say anything, the old testament was penned by some scribes who were working under orders of the relevant jewish elders at the time. It is about as divine as a cactus listening to hard trance compilations. Save your irrational claptrap for the orthodox jewish and numerologist forums. Your naive desert droolings aren't going to convince anyone here, especially those of us who work in science backgrounds FOR A LIVING.

[StrongWaters]

 out of body experiences that cannot be explained by logic and science.

Ok, lemme try.

Ahem.

But can be easily seen by common sense and simple evidence left within the letters and words of root language. What is unseen can be seen if you dig. Evidence is a mirror of what it demonstrates. Theory becomes fact with proofs that allow axioms to rise. When every axiom rises to one source continually, you are witnessing evident truth.

Faith is the collapse of the indeterminate wave function to the direction of determination. The end of the wave we collapse is way ahead in time waiting for us to arrive. Dimensional shadows show this to be correct. Below, your 2D shadow follows you. Below that, the 1D has a shadow of a dot. Above your 2D shadow, your body casts that shadow (body is 3D). Above this, your 3D body is the shadow of time--one slice at a time. Orthogonal to the moment you can observe, there are two more realities of future and past. Governing these dimensions below, your choice (Determination) collapses the wave function of a governed probability space (5D).

Just because it is complicated does not negate the proof you seek/deny/ignore.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN24Sv0qS1w

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Whoa whoa, sorry, just read this:

Coming to the cross is the account ledger cleared.

Followed by a crucifix.

Did you forget that I was one who raised the issue of t accounts? And that it was in no way linked to your bizzare thesis? I actually mentioned it because of your attempt to justify suffering (at least I think that was the point, I couldn't make it out).

You've just used as hoc reasoning to cram something unrelated into your illogical and indecipherable gibberish! And you've been caught out doing it! So called t accounts have nothing to do with the actual letter T. It just refers to the notion of separating out credits and debits with a line and a header.

How bizzare.