any evolutionary biologist worth their salt should know that every fossil and every animal (including human) is a transitional form.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 8:46 am
Thread Rating:
|
How many fossils have been discovered?
|
|
RE: How many fossils have been discovered?
January 10, 2014 at 11:50 pm
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2014 at 11:51 pm by Lemonvariable72.)
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. RE: How many fossils have been discovered?
January 11, 2014 at 10:16 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2014 at 10:52 am by Mudhammam.)
Lol @ crocoduck. So I understand that all fossils are transitional but I've generally gathered from reading Dawkins and Coyne that evolution occurs gradually, hencing blurring any long term differences with transitions that would look nearly identical from generation to generation. This seems pretty apparent among hominid fossils but how come there aren't more fossils that look more obvious to be "common ancestors"? Or are there and I'm just misinformed?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
RE: How many fossils have been discovered?
January 11, 2014 at 10:39 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2014 at 10:40 am by Rahul.)
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
(January 11, 2014 at 10:16 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Lol @ crocoduck. So I understand that all fossils are transitional but I've generally gathered from reading Dawkins and Coyne that evolution occurs gradually, hencing blurring the any long term differences with transitions that would look nearly identical from generation to generation. This seems pretty apparent among hominid fossils but how come there aren't more fossils that look more obvious to be "common ancestors"? Or are there and I'm just misinformed? There are a lot of common ancestors, it depends on how far back you're willing to go. Like you said, a lot of hominid fossils look alike, so we sort of know they belong to the same clade. But birds and crocodile share common ancestors that probably was a dinosaur. When you go really far back, the common ancestors don't look like modern animals anymore, because they've had time to gather more differences after diverging.
(January 10, 2014 at 7:17 pm)orogenicman Wrote:(January 10, 2014 at 6:05 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: I've heard that we have discovered billions of fossils, though I can't find a reputable source that isn't Creationist to confirm it. Any idea? I'm pretty sure we possess hundreds of transitional fossils but I find that fairly suspicious (as Darwin predicted the Earth should be sprawling with them) if we literally have billions. What gives? Not doubting evolution but is there something in the process that would account for this? Precisely, if you fall for that creatard "logic" of a transitional form you are merely playing in their ballpark. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




