Posts: 3628
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:29 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 2:59 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: What are your guys' opinion on William Lane Craig? He seemed some quite profound arguments that didn't just sway away from the evidence, but tackled genuine logical arguments.
WLC's arguments fail for the same reason all logical arguments for the existence of god fail, they are all fallacious.
Do you really think there are any new arguments? There aren't. And Craig's aren't anything new, or valid.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 326
Threads: 17
Joined: February 26, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 3:29 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: (March 5, 2014 at 2:59 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: What are your guys' opinion on William Lane Craig? He seemed some quite profound arguments that didn't just sway away from the evidence, but tackled genuine logical arguments.
WLC's arguments fail for the same reason all logical arguments for the existence of god fail, they are all fallacious.
Do you really think there are any new arguments? There aren't. And Craig's aren't anything new, or valid.
Why do so many people respect him and his work?
Posts: 34760
Threads: 200
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
145
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 2:59 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: What are your guys' opinion on William Lane Craig? He seemed some quite profound arguments that didn't just sway away from the evidence, but tackled genuine logical arguments.
WLC is like Ronald McDonald: A clown who's famous but has nothing real to say.
Dying to live, living to die.
Posts: 30627
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:33 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: (March 5, 2014 at 3:29 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: WLC's arguments fail for the same reason all logical arguments for the existence of god fail, they are all fallacious.
Do you really think there are any new arguments? There aren't. And Craig's aren't anything new, or valid.
Why do so many people respect him and his work?
Because people love confirmation bias.
Posts: 326
Threads: 17
Joined: February 26, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:35 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm)Beccs Wrote: (March 5, 2014 at 2:59 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: What are your guys' opinion on William Lane Craig? He seemed some quite profound arguments that didn't just sway away from the evidence, but tackled genuine logical arguments.
WLC is like Ronald McDonald: A clown who's famous but has nothing real to say.
DR. William Lane Craig.
Posts: 34760
Threads: 200
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
145
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:38 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 3:35 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: (March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm)Beccs Wrote: WLC is like Ronald McDonald: A clown who's famous but has nothing real to say.
DR. William Lane Craig.
I'll acknowledge salutations when I'm talking to the person directly and if they want to be called by their salutation, or if I meet them on a professional basis.
It's the same reason I don't demand people call me DR. RJA when I'm talking to them in a non-professional basis.
Dying to live, living to die.
Posts: 30627
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:38 pm
Wasn't it Craig that argued that we should feel bad for the soldiers who put children to the sword during the OT genocides, and not for the children themselves, because they were guaranteed to go to heaven?
Posts: 34760
Threads: 200
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
145
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:41 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 3:38 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Wasn't it Craig that argued that we should feel bad for the soldiers who put children to the sword during the OT genocides, and not for the children themselves, because they were guaranteed to go to heaven?
I'm pretty sure you're right.
What does that say about his mindset?
Dying to live, living to die.
Posts: 10416
Threads: 15
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
119
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 3:43 pm
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2014 at 4:47 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: (March 5, 2014 at 3:29 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: WLC's arguments fail for the same reason all logical arguments for the existence of god fail, they are all fallacious.
Do you really think there are any new arguments? There aren't. And Craig's aren't anything new, or valid.
Why do so many people respect him and his work?
Because he's very good at sounding profound. What's the old phrase? 'On the surface, he's profound, but deep down, he's really superficial'.
Posts: 3628
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Ok I admit it
March 5, 2014 at 4:09 pm
(March 5, 2014 at 3:31 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote: Why do so many people respect him and his work?
Because, as others have said, people want profound sounding arguments that confirm their existing beliefs.
But seriously, philosopher David Hume refuted the cosmological argument well over 200 years ago.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
|
