Einsteins theories are obsolete

[Galacticer]

Where exactly is relativity wrong?

this is a more intelligent reaction.

Well, as I stated there is no experimental proof and there are no applications for it.

So, if there is no experimental proof or validation, well, what then about the ridiculous theory? throw it away because it is wrong.

[Zen Badger]

Are you actually going to offer anything in support of your position?
Or are you just going to continue to talk bollocks?
Because the ban hammer can fall very swiftly in these parts stranger.

[Galacticer]

But are you able to tell us why you think that?

That is a very good question for you to ask yourself, kitten.

ok, so you can't.noticed.

---

Are you actually going to offer anything in support of your position?
Or are you just going to continue to talk bollocks?
Because the ban hammer can fall very swiftly in these parts stranger.

oh come on now and grow up!


Give some proof or applications for the theorie!

There is none.


why clinging to these stupid ideas?

[Zen Badger]

Still waiting for your evidence that basically overturns ALL of accepted physics.

Or are you just piss and wind?

[Galacticer]

So, some are asking me for 'suipport' but can't give me 'support' for relativity etc.

Strange and bizarre to say the least.

[Aractus]

So, it's time to stop with the Einsteinian (Relativity) nonsens.

But we need general relativity (or at the very least special relativity) in order to use GPS - what do you say to that?

[Galacticer]

Still waiting for your evidence that basically overturns ALL of accepted physics.

Or are you just piss and wind?

that is no argument at all!


Where is the support or evidence for relativity? or applications for that matter?

---

So, it's time to stop with the Einsteinian (Relativity) nonsens.

But we need general relativity (or at the very least special relativity) in order to use GPS - what do you say to that?

Yes, I know about that one, however it is not true at all

[Aractus]

Care to back up that assertion of yours with evidence?

[Zen Badger]

Care to back up that assertion of yours with evidence?

Apparently he doesn't.

And I think I hear the sound of molinjor approaching swiftly.

[Galacticer]

Care to back up that assertion of yours with evidence?

there a ye go

To offset these two effects, the GPS engineers reset the clock rates, slowing them down before launch by 39,000 nanoseconds a day. They then proceed to tick in orbit at the same rate as ground clocks, and the system "works." Ground observers can indeed pin-point their position to a high degree of precision. In (Einstein) theory, however, it was expected that because the orbiting clocks all move rapidly and with varying speeds relative to any ground observer (who may be anywhere on the Earth's surface), and since in Einstein's theory the relevant speed is always speed relative to the observer, it was expected that continuously varying relativistic corrections would have to be made to clock rates. This in turn would have introduced an unworkable complexity into the GPS. But these corrections were not made. Yet "the system manages to work, even though they use no relativistic corrections after launch," Van Flandern said. "They have basically blown off Einstein."

http://www.ldolphin.org/vanFlandern/