Einsteins theories are obsolete

[Jackalope]

Ooh, actual science? Get ready for vague, dismissive nothings from Mr Troll, if he ever comes back!

Pro-tip: Don't hold your breath.

:p

[Esquilax]

Pro-tip: Don't hold your breath.

:p

It does make me wonder what it is he hoped to gain, coming to a forum only tangentially related to what he wanted to discuss- and I'm being charitable there- to chatter away in.

Well, I guess trolls be trollin'

[tor]

Yes, it seems Einsteins theories are obsolete.

Einsten stole a lot and plagiarized from decent people like Lorentz and Poincare.
Furthermore, it is now obvous his theories are ridiculous to say the least.
And there is no good and solid experimental proof and there really are no applications for his bad bad and very flawed theories.
(As there really are no good applications from 'modern physics" at all, none whatsoever.)


So, it's time to stop with the Einsteinian (Relativity) nonsens.

So what is your theory?

[Alex K]

Oh, and I forgot to mention muon decay. So there's that.

Yes -
there would be no particle physics if the op were right, colliders like lep, lhc etc. wouldnt even work and at best produce funny noises and smoke, forget about the thousands of precision results

[little_monkey]

For those who want a watered-down derivation of Einstein's equation in GR, feel free to consult my blog at The Essential General Relativity

Warning: Lots of equations,

[Fidel_Castronaut]

So, are you going to do more than just shit all over the work of other people? Like, say... an explanation?

shit all over the work of other people? Does this imply their work must be any good, and may not be shitted on? your just jumping to conclusions.

Do plese tell if you have found anything good that has come out of this bullshit, there is none.

Late to the party, I know, but generally, in honest and intellectually rigorous debate and dialogue, one usually presents evidence to the contrary in the form of an argument or data (preferably both) which explains or highlights the erroneous nature of the argument/evidence/data to which they are opposed.

Just sayin.

But it is amusing listening to people online who like to think they're putting the world to rights with a quick search on google.

"One of the cornerstones of modern science, something that has been responsible for a myriad of break thoughts both technological and social that it would be near impossible to count, is wrong. But no worries guys! I've done a quick google search and figured all that shit out! Turns out I'm right, despite having no qualifications or evidence to back up my assertions and coming across as a bit of a loon who made a break for it when they left the door unlocked."

*yawn* what else is on?

[pocaracas]

How did I miss this thread?
Oh yeah...I took a look at the title and thought I didn't want to lose IQ points.
I'm going to sleep now, so no problem of that happening! :p
Applied relativity? Radar.

[MindForgedManacle]

Yes, it seems Einsteins theories are obsolete.

Cool story bro.

Einsten stole a lot and plagiarized from decent people like Lorentz and Poincare.

I highly doubt that, as Lorentz doesn't seem to have thought so, seeing as he accepted Special Relativity after experiments corraborated it.

Furthermore, it is now obvous his theories are ridiculous to say the least.

You're full of shit. Give some good evidence to back up this claim.

And there is no good and solid experimental proof and there really are no applications for his bad bad and very flawed theories.
(As there really are no good applications from 'modern physics" at all, none whatsoever.)

You mean aside from the experimentally verified fact that particles moving near light speed last longer? Or that our curremt experimental results empirically verify that time dilatation and length contraction occur, as predicted by Special Relativity?

So, it's time to stop with the Einsteinian (Relativity) nonsens.

Go back to circle-jerking with William Lane Craig, because it sounds like you're just parroting his nonsense.