Einsteins theories are obsolete

[Galacticer]

duh?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Did you read the article dude?????

me thinks not!

---

But I looked up the wiki article on Tom van Flandern.

That was amusing.

Ohh trying that angle now?


won't help

it really is bollocks the whole of relativity


it looks like you are defending a belief system without any substance.

[Esquilax]

very strange reaction indeed

Do you think you're the first random stranger to drift by here and confidently assert that "you can't prove X isn't true, so nyah nyah!" without a shred of backing evidence, or even a cogent argument beyond "you're all wrong!"?

[Zen Badger]

But I looked up the wiki article on Tom van Flandern.

That was amusing.

Ohh trying that angle now?


won't help

it really is bollocks the whoel of relativiry,


it looks like you are defending a blief system without any substance.

Yes, that angle, so unless you something substantive we're done here.

[Little lunch]

Wow, what a debate that was.

[Aractus]

and so there are no applicatiosn that need relatvity, or quantum theory for that matter, all nonsense.

You're an idiot. They use an approximated formula - that'd be like using an approximate pi value instead of one of the "correct" complicated formulas like 355/113 which would still be accurate enough for almost every real-world use we have for it.

[Zen Badger]

Wow, what a debate that was.

That wasn't a debate.
That was some lunatic espousing the crackpot theories of another lunatic.

[Galacticer]

very strange reaction indeed

Do you think you're the first random stranger to drift by here and confidently assert that "you can't prove X isn't true, so nyah nyah!" without a shred of backing evidence, or even a cogent argument beyond "you're all wrong!"?

Offcourse not!

But on the other hand, you see how irrational it all is.
It shouldn't matter if it was a stranger or whatever, because in the end it is not about who is saying it,
so, you are proving my point that it is about a belief system and not something which is very logical and rational, far from it.
(science really is disguided form of religion, yes I know how absurd thism may seem at first, however it really is)

---

Wow, what a debate that was.

That wasn't a debate.
That was some lunatic espousing the crackpot theories of another lunatic.

well, that was one way of defending you beliefsystem, it really is nothing more.

[Zen Badger]

Pffft, you're not the first babbling idiot to sully these forums with your inane drivel and you won't be the last.

So again, unless you have something of actual substance to offer, we are done here.

[Esquilax]

Offcourse not!

So you recognize that you've come here with nothing more than an argument from ignorance?

But on the other hand, you see how irrational it all is.

It would be highly irrational to believe every lunatic who had some crackpot theory backed up only by "you can't prove me wrong!"

It shouldn't matter if it was a stranger or whatever, because in the end it is not about who is saying it,

My point wasn't that you were a stranger, but that your entire argument is one big fallacy, presented in the most obnoxious way possible.

so, you are proving my point that it is about a belief system and not something which is very logical and rational, far from it.
(science really is disguided form of religion, yes I know how absurd thism may seem at first, however it really is)

Oh, fuck off, you petty little troll.

Present something more than a fallacy, and you might be taken seriously. But we can all see how much you're tapdancing to avoid having to support your claim at all, which shows how little support there must actually be, in there.

[truthBtold]

Define this Einstein character first.. nah nah!!