RE: If there is no such thing as the supernatural, then how do you explain this?
July 18, 2014 at 12:57 am
(July 17, 2014 at 5:37 am)Tonus Wrote:Or, that they're evidence of lens flare, aperture corruption, double exposures, bloom, improperly exposed and/or improperly developed and/or improperly fixed photographic film and/or paper, or......(July 16, 2014 at 6:19 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: If ghosts existed and could actually be captured photographically, their existence would not even be in question. Photography is a 170 year-old practice.Hmmm... is Rev saying that these photographs are physical evidence of the supernatural?