RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 3:55 pm
Far as I understand it he pulled a private conversation into the open. Which is a breach of trust in any case and obviously against the rules.
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 3:55 pm
Far as I understand it he pulled a private conversation into the open. Which is a breach of trust in any case and obviously against the rules.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 4:12 pm
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 4:30 pm
The actual wording of the PM rule is that "Posting the contents of private correspondence of any kind is not allowed", which is really cut and dry. Without it, what's the point of being able to block someone bothering you if they just say what they want to in open forum? Not to mention the calling out rule as well. Hopefully penguin can come back a reformed penguin and we can all just move along.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite. Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment. Quote:Some people deserve hell. I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 5:08 pm
He was lucky not to get his sorry ass permabanned. We will see him when he had his vacation.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 5:22 pm
(This post was last modified: August 23, 2016 at 5:30 pm by Whateverist.)
(August 7, 2016 at 6:24 pm)Luckie Wrote: You wanna live through the day? Don't call Luckie a bitch. Just a friendly reminder from me to anyone. Can't believe ye be bitchin about what people be calling ye. Bitches! What are ye gonna do? Can't live with their bitchin', can't get em' to knock it to hell off. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 5:37 pm
(This post was last modified: August 23, 2016 at 5:38 pm by Whateverist.)
That's our Pengy! Always daring to go where good sense, common decency and the rules say you can't.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 5:40 pm
Hmm. Wonder if we could shut down one of the servers while Pengy is away to save some money. I wonder how much our post count will drop in his absence.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 5:47 pm
(August 23, 2016 at 3:41 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:(August 23, 2016 at 3:38 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, Gotcha. I'm being snarky, just to be clear. Mostly... If it is any comfort, if you met me IRL, you would be shocked to learn that I am exactly as online, maybe a bit less acerbic.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 5:51 pm
(August 23, 2016 at 3:41 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:(August 23, 2016 at 3:38 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, Gotcha. I'm being snarky, just to be clear. Mostly... Hey, I knew that. I've had girlfriends before you know. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
August 23, 2016 at 6:14 pm
Yeah, I'm pretty careful about who I get to know online, because too often we only see what we're permitted. When I see someone trying to reimage his online persona, the distrust only deepens.
It's very important to me to be myself online, which is why I don't mind letting some personal info out. I want to be liked for myself, not for a role I play. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|