(January 3, 2015 at 5:12 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Cambridge, presumably.
Wait, education is supposed to reduce terrorism ... what gives?!
The cambrian explosion
|
(January 3, 2015 at 5:12 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Cambridge, presumably. Wait, education is supposed to reduce terrorism ... what gives?!
Probably Camberwell, then.
Or Camberwick Green. I always knew that Windy Miller was up to some deep shit.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: The cambrian explosion
January 3, 2015 at 8:23 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2015 at 8:26 pm by polar bear.)
(January 2, 2015 at 7:43 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Short answer: No Lemon, thanks for this fact! What proof do we have that the environment changed? I run up against this stupid shit a lot, and if I can point to this fact, it will shut some people up at least for awhile. (January 3, 2015 at 3:09 pm)Stimbo Wrote: The important factor is the emergence of free oxygen in the atmosphere, in the first great pollution event. Oxygen is basically rocket fuel for multicellular life. Thanks Stimbo...should have read further RE: The cambrian explosion
January 3, 2015 at 8:27 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2015 at 8:29 pm by abaris.)
(January 3, 2015 at 8:23 pm)polar bear Wrote: What proof do we have that the environment changed? Geology. Think of the earth as a multi layered cake, that you can read if you cut pieces out. Not that it will make any difference when talking to christers. RE: The cambrian explosion
January 3, 2015 at 8:48 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2015 at 9:10 pm by pocaracas.)
(January 2, 2015 at 6:52 pm)king krish Wrote: SoDoes Lorentzian space time contraction prove evolution is wrong? Does room temperature superconductIvity prove evolution is wrong? Does stellar formation prove evolution is wrong? Does plate tectonics prove evolution is wrong? Does psychology prove evolution is wrong? Did I miss any corner of science? (January 3, 2015 at 8:48 pm)pocaracas Wrote:(January 2, 2015 at 6:52 pm)king krish Wrote: SoDoes Lorentzian space time contraction prove evolution is wrong? Hey! I've patented that technique!
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
(January 3, 2015 at 9:02 pm)Jenny A Wrote:Sorry, I can't see patents when I'm on my phone.(January 3, 2015 at 8:48 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Does Lorentzian space time contraction prove evolution is wrong? Quote:Geology. Geology is hard for theists, though. See...they have this dumb old book of horseshit that they rely on..... |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Immense Cambrian fossil bed discovered "rivals the famous Burgess Shale" | Jackalope | 12 | 3338 |
February 12, 2014 at 10:59 am Last Post: houseofcantor |
|
The Cambrian Mystery | Mudhammam | 9 | 3160 |
January 24, 2014 at 3:22 am Last Post: Mudhammam |
|
An answer to the Cambrian conundrum | popeyespappy | 1 | 1546 |
November 29, 2011 at 10:39 am Last Post: Anomalocaris |