Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 1:38 pm
(February 17, 2015 at 1:21 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: What is beauty? Is that inquiry susceptible to the scientific method?
Yes, in that we can discover why it is that certain standards for beauty, or cuteness, or any other attribute of appearance, based on our evolutionary lineage and psychology, and create a rough metric from that. It's not going to be perfect, but then, what is?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 1:38 pm
(February 17, 2015 at 1:38 pm)Esquilax Wrote: It's not going to be perfect, but then, what is?
Obviously you haven't seen my glorious ass.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 1:39 pm
Good point watch, if the aim of a piece of art is to be beautiful, then it can be tested to see if it is indeed beautiful according to a group of dudes and ladies.
Posts: 743
Threads: 35
Joined: December 1, 2014
Reputation:
12
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 1:39 pm
(February 17, 2015 at 12:14 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Well right off the bat the existence of a 'soul' is something that must be proven...and the only tools we have to prove the existence of something are surprise, surprise, the tools of scientific investigation. Also, philosophy or science might be able to show that a definition of "soul" or "paradise" is logically incoherent or would violate known science.
Posts: 1817
Threads: 18
Joined: April 22, 2011
Reputation:
17
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 1:46 pm
Anybody remember Jubal Harshaw's thoughts on beauty?
Posts: 743
Threads: 35
Joined: December 1, 2014
Reputation:
12
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 3:11 pm
(February 17, 2015 at 1:46 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote: Anybody remember Jubal Harshaw's thoughts on beauty? I'm embarrassed to say that I had to look up the name on Wikipedia. I couldn't find the quote you mentioned though.
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 3:13 pm
(February 17, 2015 at 11:40 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: (February 17, 2015 at 10:50 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: It seems to me that "purpose" and "beauty" are within the magisterium of science too. For example, science can measure psychological wellbeing, productivity, emotional reaction, etc.
Take the example of cooking recipes. Science can measure the quality of recipes in various ways. One recipe might be nutritious. Another recipe might have mass appeal...
I don't think science is equipped to address æsthetics, or subjective matters like taste. I also don't think science provides "purpose" to anything.
Well, scientists have recently determined that penguins have lost 3 of the 5 basic tastes over time. They cannot taste the fish they eat or fruit given to them to eat. So they certainly can address that issue objectively.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...131109.htm
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 3:20 pm
(February 17, 2015 at 1:38 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: (February 17, 2015 at 1:38 pm)Esquilax Wrote: It's not going to be perfect, but then, what is?
Obviously you haven't seen my glorious ass.
Well, I thought it was implied that that was perfect! 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 3:21 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2015 at 3:21 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(February 17, 2015 at 3:20 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (February 17, 2015 at 1:38 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Obviously you haven't seen my glorious ass.
Well, I thought it was implied that that was perfect!
Indeed it is. Feast your eyes~
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 21822
Threads: 24
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 17, 2015 at 7:16 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2015 at 7:20 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 17, 2015 at 1:33 pm)watchamadoodle Wrote: Science could measure our reactions to different stimuli, create hypotheses about these reactions, test these hypotheses experimentally, ...
And what would those numbers say about the nature of beauty?
(February 17, 2015 at 1:36 pm)robvalue Wrote: Beauty could be examined by the brain states it produced in the guy experiencing it I guess.
But yeah, an opinion on something is fine, it's not a way of finding stuff out, and it's not a claim. No uber-method is being pretended.
I think that art gives us insight into ourselves, which is very useful information. The fact that there are a multiplicity of personal views on art in its many forms makes me think it's so intensely personal that science cannot really address it in any meaningful fashion. Sure, you can take PET scans and pulse-rates, but what does that actually tell you?
|
![[Image: cf2358e097c6d1d3dc95592675546837.jpg]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/cf/23/58/cf2358e097c6d1d3dc95592675546837.jpg)
