Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 2:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LHC
#21
RE: LHC
Large hard-on collider
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
#22
RE: LHC
Lovely hair curlers
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#23
RE: LHC
(February 18, 2015 at 12:49 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote: Large hard-on collider

That joke is so 2009 Tongue

'm just bored by people reading about some science thing they don't understand, and all the sudden remembering all those "urgent matters" it should be sacrificed for.

What's the current price tag on JSF development, 300 billion? LOL. The LHC cost about as much as the new train connection between cologne and frankfurt. Guess what people will remember in 100 years? That we found some fundamental principles behind the laws of nature, or that I can go to frankfurt airport in an hour from my house (yay!).

The money spent on building a supercollider all goes into the know how of privatr contractors getting experience building machines to specifications hitherto unknown to engineering. It goes into the education of thousands of phd and master students who go on working in IT and industry, and tech companies having better materials, electronics, worldwide next generation high speed networks.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#24
RE: LHC
(February 18, 2015 at 1:34 pm)Alex K Wrote: 'm just bored by people reading about some science thing they don't understand, and all the sudden remembering all those "urgent matters" it should be sacrificed for.

What's the current price tag on JSF development, 300 billion? LOL. The LHC cost about as much as the new train connection between cologne and frankfurt. Guess what people will remember in 100 years? That we found some fundamental principles behind the laws of nature, or that I can go to frankfurt airport in an hour from my house (yay!).

The money spent on building a supercollider all goes into the know how of privatr contractors getting experience building machines to specifications hitherto unknown to engineering. It goes into the education of thousands of phd and master students who go on working in IT and industry, and tech companies having better materials, electronics, worldwide next generation high speed networks.
I could not agree more. People have the same argument for NASA, and while I think NASA's days are numbers, the private sector has greatly benefited from the things NASA had to invent to make shit work.

From the experiments done at the LHC we are learning fundamental things about our universe. Things that will have FAR reaching effects in the private sector. CERN in general is doing fantastic things that we all will benefit from.

While I do not pretend to even remotely comprehend the experimental physics that is happening there, I do understand how important it is.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#25
RE: LHC
No kidding, back in the 50s the US government had letters from constituents terrified the atomic bomb tests in the Pacific Ocean would blow a hole in the seafloor and let all the water out.

There was a brief concern nukes might set the air on fire, but the maths showed it just wasn't possible. And that goes for both a chemical reaction oxidizing all the nitrogen, and a propagating nuclear fusion reaction burning the world to a cinder. Turns out kindling a fusion reaction is rather difficult and takes an extremely clever and well designed thermonuclear device to pull it off. Just supplying a random gigantic spark of energy to the atmosphere doesn't come close to doing it. Even setting off the largest possible nuclear bomb we could build at the center of Jupiter wouldn't ignite it, and it is orders of magnitude closer to being so than our air, or even the bottom of the Marianas Trench.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#26
RE: LHC
Yeah - but let's not compare colliding two beams 100 meters underground with the power of an average freight train to detonating hydrogen bombs. One is a huge explosion with a mile wide fireball, and when the other goes wrong, you have some fried coils, an annoying helium leak and a nice hole in the wall Tongue (although the automatic beam dump mechanism is very very fast and kicks in before a magnet can say "puff")
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)